Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season
Auburn paired 26 primary output with 40.8 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Tackles | TFL | Sacks | QB Hur | PD | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Postseason | Auburn | 7 | 3 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | 27.9 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Auburn | 7 | 10 | 1.5 | 0 | 2 | - | 0 | 27.9 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Auburn | 8 | 21 | 4 | 4 | 2 | - | 0 | 35.5 |
| 2021 Postseason | Auburn | 13 | 1 | 0.5 | 0 | - | - | 0 | 57.3 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Auburn | 13 | 51 | 12 | 9 | 1 | - | 0 | 57.3 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Auburn | 12 | 60 | 11.5 | 6.5 | 7 | - | 0 | 73.4 |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season
Auburn paired 26 primary output with 40.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 40.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2022 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Mississippi State
Loss with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
2.2
Efficiency
40.8
Usage
14.7
Consistency
52.9
Best Game by takeover score
Mississippi State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Mercer: 3. San José State: 2. Penn State: 1. Missouri: 6. LSU: 3. Georgia: 0. Ole Miss: 2. Arkansas: 1. Mississippi State: 6. Texas A&M: 0. Western Kentucky: 0. Alabama: 2
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Mercer: 2 by 38.3. San José State: 8 by 53.3. Penn State: 5 by 30.8. Missouri: 6 by 75. LSU: 3 by 42.5. Georgia: 6 by 25. Ole Miss: 10 by 61.7. Arkansas: 6 by 35. Mississippi State: 8 by 83.3. Texas A&M: 2 by 8.3. Western Kentucky: 2 by 8.3. Alabama: 2 by 28.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.