Player Stats

Jaylin Simpson College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
118
TFL
4
QB hurries
3
Passes defended
14
Touchdowns
2

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2019 Regular SeasonAuburn220.50--018.6
2020 PostseasonAuburn72-0--035.7
2020 Regular SeasonAuburn7121013035.7
2021 PostseasonAuburn92-0--042.4
2021 Regular SeasonAuburn9251013042.4
2022 Regular SeasonAuburn1137-0-5033.8
2023 Regular SeasonAuburn12381.5013255.8

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season

Auburn paired 9.5 primary output with 21.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

2023 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 21.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2023 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Texas A&M

Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2023 Regular Season · Auburn

Games

12

Havoc Plays / G

0.8

Efficiency

21.1

Usage

5.4

Consistency

57

Best Game by takeover score

Texas A&M

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Massachusetts: 1. California: 1. Samford: 1. Texas A&M: 2. Georgia: 2. LSU: 1. Ole Miss: 0.5. Mississippi State: 0. Vanderbilt: 1. Arkansas: 0. New Mexico State: 0. Alabama: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Massachusetts: 3 by 22.5. California: 4 by 26.7. Samford: 3 by 22.5. Texas A&M: 3 by 32.5. Georgia: 3 by 32.5. LSU: 4 by 26.7. Ole Miss: 2 by 13.3. Mississippi State: 2 by 8.3. Vanderbilt: 6 by 35. Arkansas: 1 by 4.2. New Mexico State: 6 by 25. Alabama: 1 by 4.2

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.7 · Games = 6 · -0.3 vs Losses
Losses0.9 · Games = 6 · +0.3 vs Wins