Usage Score
15.4
Player Dossier
2019-2023Alabama
Justin Eboigbe
DL • 6'5" • 292 lbs • Forest Park, GA, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Justin Eboigbe shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 32.7 disruption score.
Efficiency
32.7
Consistency
56.8
Season Value
34.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason · Alabama
1920202121222323
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- Alabama
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Texas A&M
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Justin Eboigbe, DL. Best season Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason · Alabama. Justin Eboigbe shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 32.7 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason
Alabama paired 19.5 primary output with 32.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2023 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 32.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Texas A&M
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2023 Postseason · Alabama
Games
14
Havoc Plays / G
1.4
Efficiency
32.7
Usage
15.4
Consistency
56.8
Best Game by takeover score
Michigan
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011121314
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Michigan: 0. Middle Tennessee: 0. Texas: 1. South Florida: 1. Ole Miss: 0. Mississippi State: 1. Texas A&M: 3. Arkansas: 2. Tennessee: 1.5. LSU: 2. Kentucky: 3. Unknown: 1. Auburn: 2. Georgia: 2
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Michigan: 4 by 16.7. Middle Tennessee: 2 by 8.3. Texas: 4 by 26.7. South Florida: 5 by 30.8. Ole Miss: 3 by 12.5. Mississippi State: 6 by 35. Texas A&M: 5 by 50.8. Arkansas: 5 by 40.8. Tennessee: 8 by 48.3. LSU: 6 by 45. Kentucky: 3 by 42.5. Unknown: 5 by 30.8. Auburn: 4 by 36.7. Georgia: 3 by 32.5
Split Comparison
Wins1.6 · n=11 · +1.1 vs Losses
Losses0.5 · n=2 · -1.1 vs Wins
First Half0.9 · n=7 · -1.1 vs Second Half
Second Half1.9 · n=7 · +1.1 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Texas A&M
Best efficiency game
50.8 vs Texas A&M
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 1/1 | @ Michigan | L 20-27 | 4 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 12/2 | vs Georgia | W 27-24 | 3 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/25 | @ Auburn | W 27-24 | 4 | 3 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/18 | vs Unknown | — | 5 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/11 | @ KentuckySplash game | W 49-21 | 3 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/4 | vs LSU | W 42-28 | 6 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/21 | vs Tennessee | W 34-20 | 8 | 5 | — | 1.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/14 | vs Arkansas | W 24-21 | 5 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/7 | @ Texas A&M | W 26-20 | 5 | 2 | — | 1.50 | 1.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/1 | @ Mississippi State | W 40-17 | 6 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/23 | vs Ole Miss | W 24-10 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/16 | @ South Florida | W 17-3 | 5 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/9 | vs Texas | L 24-34 | 4 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/2 | vs Middle Tennessee | W 56-7 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Alabama
2019-2023
Opening stop
Season Progression
20192020202020212021202220232023
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Regular Season | Alabama | 4.5 | 21.7 | 7.2 | — |
| 2020 Postseason | Alabama | 1.5 | 8.2 | 2.2 | -3 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Alabama | 1.5 | 8.2 | 2.2 | 0 |
| 2021 Postseason | Alabama | 3 | 8.4 | 1.3 | 1.5 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Alabama | 3 | 8.4 | 1.3 | 0 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Alabama | 0.5 | 12.7 | 2.7 | -2.5 |
| 2023 Postseason | Alabama | 19.5 | 32.7 | 15.4 | 19 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Alabama | 19.5 | 32.7 | 15.4 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Texas A&M
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3
Primary metric
3 disruption/tackle impact with 56.1 takeover score.
#2
LSU
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 55.8 takeover score.
#3
Unknown
3
Primary metric
Game with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 54.6 takeover score.
#4
Kentucky
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 52.7 takeover score.
#5
Georgia
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 42.7 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2023 Postseason · Alabama
19.5 primary output · 32.7 efficiency · 15.4 usage
34.4
#2
2023 Regular Season · Alabama
34.4
19.5 primary · 32.7 efficiency · 15.4 usage
#3
2019 Regular Season · Alabama
18.8
4.5 primary · 21.7 efficiency · 7.2 usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
2
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2019 · Rating 0.9697
Forest Park · Forest Park, GA
- Committed To
- Alabama
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2019
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
121
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 46 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.