Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season
UAB paired 24 primary output with 37.3 efficiency.
Player Stats
A.J. Gates College Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Career production snapshot
- Scrimmage yards
- 37
- Rushing yards
- 37
Season Ledger
Crawlable season-by-season stats
| Season | Team | Games | Scrimmage | Rush Yds | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Regular Season | Alabama | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2021 Regular Season | UAB | 3 | 24 | 24 | 0 | 0 | 47.8 |
| 2022 Postseason | UAB | 3 | -1 | -1 | 0 | 0 | 22.6 |
| 2022 Regular Season | UAB | 3 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 22.6 |
Player insights
Supporting note
2022 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 6.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2022 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Alabama, UAB.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Middle Tennessee
Win with 14 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2022 Postseason · UAB
Games
3
Scrimmage Yards / G
4.3
Efficiency
6.1
Usage
6.7
Consistency
11.1
Best Game by takeover score
Middle Tennessee
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Miami (OH): -1. Middle Tennessee: 14. Louisiana Tech: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Miami (OH): 2 by 0. Middle Tennessee: 8 by 18.2. Louisiana Tech: 1 by 0
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
First Half6.5 · Games = 2 · +6.5 vs Second Half
Second Half0 · Games = 1 · -6.5 vs First Half
Next best actions
Keep exploring A.J. Gates
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.