Player Stats

Christian Harris College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
215
TFL
27.5
Sacks
10
QB hurries
15
Passes defended
6

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2019 PostseasonAlabama13920-1051.5
2019 Regular SeasonAlabama13545.505-051.5
2020 PostseasonAlabama126-0--070.2
2020 Regular SeasonAlabama126774.562070.2
2021 PostseasonAlabama15114.53.51-062.7
2021 Regular SeasonAlabama15688.5233062.7

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason

Alabama paired 20.5 primary output with 43.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

2021 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 37.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2021 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Georgia

Loss with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2021 Postseason · Alabama

Games

15

Havoc Plays / G

1.7

Efficiency

37.6

Usage

9.6

Consistency

32.9

Best Game by takeover score

Georgia

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112131415

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Georgia: 7. Cincinnati: 2. Miami: 3. Mercer: 1. Florida: 1. Southern Miss: 2. Ole Miss: 1. Texas A&M: 0. Mississippi State: 1. Tennessee: 0.5. LSU: 4. New Mexico State: 0. Arkansas: 2. Auburn: 1. Georgia: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Georgia: 7 by 79.2. Cincinnati: 4 by 36.7. Miami: 5 by 50.8. Mercer: 8 by 43.3. Florida: 6 by 35. Southern Miss: 5 by 40.8. Ole Miss: 3 by 22.5. Texas A&M: 4 by 16.7. Mississippi State: 5 by 30.8. Tennessee: 5 by 25.8. LSU: 6 by 65. New Mexico State: 6 by 25. Arkansas: 5 by 40.8. Auburn: 5 by 30.8. Georgia: 5 by 20.8

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins1.4 · Games = 13 · -2.1 vs Losses
Losses3.5 · Games = 2 · +2.1 vs Wins