Usage Score
12.2
Player Dossier
2021-2025USC
Lake McRee
TE • 6'4" • 250 lbs • Austin, TX, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Lake McRee reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
77.3
Consistency
66.8
Season Value
63.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · USC
2122232425
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- USC
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: BYU
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Lake McRee, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · USC. Lake McRee reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season
USC paired 450 primary output with 77.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 77.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2025 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Purdue
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 91.7th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Regular Season · USC
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
37.5
Efficiency
77.3
Usage
12.2
Consistency
66.8
Best Game by takeover score
UCLA
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Missouri State: 72. Georgia Southern: 34. Purdue: 67. Michigan State: 16. Illinois: 59. Michigan: 41. Notre Dame: 18. Nebraska: 11. Northwestern: 52. Iowa: 19. Oregon: 31. UCLA: 30
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Missouri State: 2 by 100. Georgia Southern: 2 by 100. Purdue: 3 by 100. Michigan State: 2 by 53.3. Illinois: 3 by 100. Michigan: 2 by 100. Notre Dame: 2 by 60. Nebraska: 2 by 36.7. Northwestern: 3 by 100. Iowa: 3 by 42.2. Oregon: 3 by 68.9. UCLA: 3 by 66.7
Split Comparison
Wins38 · n=9 · +2 vs Losses
Losses36 · n=3 · -2 vs Wins
First Half48.2 · n=6 · +21.3 vs Second Half
Second Half26.8 · n=6 · -21.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Purdue
Best efficiency game
100 vs Northwestern
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 11/30 | vs UCLA | W 29-10 | — | 3 | 30 | 10 | 10 | 1 | 14 |
| Sat 11/22 | @ Oregon | L 27-42 | — | 3 | 31 | 10.3 | 10.30 | 1 | 13 |
| Sat 11/15 | vs Iowa | W 26-21 | — | 3 | 19 | 6.3 | 6.30 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 11/8 | vs Northwestern | W 38-17 | — | 3 | 52 | 17.3 | 17.30 | 0 | 42 |
| Sat 11/1 | @ Nebraska | W 21-17 | — | 2 | 11 | 5.5 | 5.50 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Notre Dame | L 24-34 | — | 2 | 18 | 9 | 9 | 1 | 10 |
| Sat 10/11 | vs Michigan | W 31-13 | — | 2 | 41 | 20.5 | 20.50 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 9/27 | @ Illinois | L 32-34 | — | 3 | 59 | 19.7 | 19.70 | 0 | 24 |
| Sun 9/21 | vs Michigan State | W 45-31 | — | 2 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 9/13 | @ Purdue | W 33-17 | — | 3 | 67 | 22.3 | 22.30 | 0 | 29 |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Georgia Southern | W 59-20 | — | 2 | 34 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 8/30 | vs Missouri State | W 73-13 | — | 2 | 72 | 36 | 36 | 1 | 64 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
USC
2021-2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
20212022202320242025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 Regular Season | USC | 91 | 74.4 | 9.5 | — |
| 2022 Regular Season | USC | 106 | 62.1 | 6.3 | 15 |
| 2023 Regular Season | USC | 262 | 58.4 | 9.3 | 156 |
| 2024 Regular Season | USC | 245 | 59.2 | 9.7 | -17 |
| 2025 Regular Season | USC | 450 | 77.3 | 12.2 | 205 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
BYU
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
63
Primary metric
63 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
California
71
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
71 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Utah State
81
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
81 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Notre Dame
37
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
37 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Purdue
67
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
67 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2025 Regular Season · USC
450 primary output · 77.3 efficiency · 12.2 usage
63.8
#2
2023 Regular Season · USC
45
262 primary · 58.4 efficiency · 9.3 usage
#3
2024 Regular Season · USC
39.4
245 primary · 59.2 efficiency · 9.7 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2021 · Rating 0.8826
Lake Travis · Austin, TX
- Committed To
- USC
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2021
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
1,154
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 43 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.