Player Stats

John Humphrey College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
97
TFL
1
Passes defended
7

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2020 Regular SeasonUCLA11-0--037
2021 Regular SeasonUCLA35-0-1013.2
2022 Regular SeasonUCLA123710--014.1
2023 Regular SeasonUCLA1131-0-3037.9
2024 PostseasonUSC106-0--033.3
2024 Regular SeasonUSC1017-0-3033.3

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season

UCLA paired 5 primary output with 16.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

2024 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 14.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2024 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across UCLA, USC.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Notre Dame

Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 90th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2024 Postseason · USC

Games

10

Havoc Plays / G

0.4

Efficiency

14.6

Usage

3.4

Consistency

10

Best Game by takeover score

Notre Dame

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Texas A&M: 0. LSU: 0. Utah State: 0. Wisconsin: 0. Penn State: 1. Maryland: 0. Rutgers: 2. Washington: 0. UCLA: 0. Notre Dame: 1

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas A&M: 6 by 25. LSU: 3 by 12.5. Utah State: 1 by 4.2. Wisconsin: 2 by 8.3. Penn State: 3 by 22.5. Maryland: 4 by 16.7. Rutgers: 1 by 24.2. Washington: 2 by 8.3. UCLA: 1 by 4.2

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.3 · Games = 6 · -0.2 vs Losses
Losses0.5 · Games = 4 · +0.2 vs Wins