Player Stats

D.J. Woodbury Sr. College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
146
TFL
7
Sacks
2
QB hurries
3

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2020 Regular SeasonTemple00-0--0-
2021 Regular SeasonTemple714-0--039.9
2022 Regular SeasonTemple5150.502-024.4
2023 Regular SeasonTemple4241.50--040.7
2024 Regular SeasonTemple1193521-062.8

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season

Temple paired 9 primary output with 41.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

2024 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 41.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2024 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: UTSA

Loss with 5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2024 Regular Season · Temple

Games

11

Havoc Plays / G

0.8

Efficiency

41.9

Usage

12.9

Consistency

9.1

Best Game by takeover score

UTSA

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Oklahoma: 0. Coastal Carolina: 2. Utah State: 0. Army: 0. UConn: 1.5. Tulsa: 0. East Carolina: 0. Tulane: 0. Florida Atlantic: 0. UTSA: 5. North Texas: 0.5

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oklahoma: 3 by 12.5. Coastal Carolina: 15 by 70. Utah State: 10 by 41.7. Army: 10 by 41.7. UConn: 7 by 44.2. Tulsa: 6 by 25. East Carolina: 5 by 20.8. Tulane: 10 by 41.7. Florida Atlantic: 8 by 33.3. UTSA: 13 by 100. North Texas: 6 by 30

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0 · Games = 3 · -1.1 vs Losses
Losses1.1 · Games = 8 · +1.1 vs Wins