Player Stats

Nahki Johnson College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
50
TFL
9
Sacks
4

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2021 Regular SeasonPittsburgh23-0--039.4
2022 Regular SeasonPittsburgh1311--060.3
2023 Regular SeasonPittsburgh330.50--07.9
2024 Regular SeasonPittsburgh61410--011
2025 Regular SeasonTulsa10276.53--054.7

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season

Pittsburgh paired 2 primary output with 32.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

2025 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 20.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2025 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Pittsburgh, Tulsa.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Florida Atlantic

Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2025 Regular Season · Tulsa

Games

10

Havoc Plays / G

0.9

Efficiency

20.8

Usage

6.6

Consistency

43

Best Game by takeover score

Florida Atlantic

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Abilene Christian: 1.5. New Mexico State: 1.5. Navy: 0. Memphis: 0.5. East Carolina: 0. Temple: 1. Florida Atlantic: 3. Oregon State: 2. Army: 0. UAB: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Abilene Christian: 7 by 44.2. New Mexico State: 4 by 31.7. Navy: 1 by 4.2. Memphis: 2 by 13.3. East Carolina: 2 by 8.3. Temple: 4 by 26.7. Florida Atlantic: 2 by 38.3. Oregon State: 1 by 24.2. Army: 1 by 4.2. UAB: 3 by 12.5

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins1.2 · Games = 3 · +0.3 vs Losses
Losses0.9 · Games = 7 · -0.3 vs Wins