Player Stats

Anthony Sambucci College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
1,006
Receptions
75
Touchdowns
10

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2020 Regular SeasonWestern Michigan1-00100
2021 PostseasonWestern Michigan3-00100
2021 Regular SeasonWestern Michigan3-00100
2022 Regular SeasonWestern Michigan1020276265.8
2023 Regular SeasonWestern Michigan921318564.1
2024 PostseasonWestern Michigan10336175.8
2024 Regular SeasonWestern Michigan1031376275.8

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season

Western Michigan paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.

Supporting note

2024 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 70.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2024 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Bethune-Cookman

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2024 Postseason · Western Michigan

Games

10

Receiving Yards / G

41.2

Efficiency

70.9

Usage

21.1

Consistency

62

Best Game by takeover score

Bethune-Cookman

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. South Alabama: 36. Wisconsin: 12. Ohio State: 41. Bethune-Cookman: 103. Marshall: 56. Ball State: 74. Buffalo: 33. Northern Illinois: 34. Bowling Green: 22. Central Michigan: 1

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. South Alabama: 3 by 80. Wisconsin: 2 by 40. Ohio State: 3 by 91.1. Bethune-Cookman: 4 by 100. Marshall: 4 by 93.3. Ball State: 9 by 54.8. Buffalo: 3 by 73.3. Northern Illinois: 2 by 100. Bowling Green: 2 by 73.3. Central Michigan: 2 by 3.3

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins70 · Games = 3 · +41.1 vs Losses
Losses28.9 · Games = 7 · -41.1 vs Wins