Usage Score
22.8
Player Dossier
2020-2023Iowa State
Hunter Dekkers
QB • 6'3" • 225 lbs • Hawarden, IA, USA
Balanced quarterback profileVolume operator
Hunter Dekkers is a balanced quarterback profile with variable involvement in the latest tracked season.
Efficiency
57.4
Consistency
83
Season Value
65.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · Iowa State
20212223
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Iowa State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Kansas
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Hunter Dekkers, QB. Best season Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · Iowa State. Hunter Dekkers is a balanced quarterback profile with variable involvement in the latest tracked season.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season
Iowa State paired 3,117 primary output with 57.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Regular Season role shape
pass-led usage with 57.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2023 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Texas
Loss with 359 yards of offense and 68 efficiency. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2022 Regular Season · Iowa State
Games
12
Primary Metric / G
259.8
Efficiency
57.4
Usage
22.8
Consistency
83
Best Game by takeover score
TCU
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 304. Iowa: 198. Ohio: 267. Baylor: 270. Kansas: 266. Kansas State: 213. Texas: 359. Oklahoma: 339. West Virginia: 207. Oklahoma State: 265. Texas Tech: 323. TCU: 106
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 34 by 70.8. Iowa: 47 by 50.2. Ohio: 42 by 60. Baylor: 47 by 51.9. Kansas: 57 by 51. Kansas State: 42 by 59.7. Texas: 44 by 68. Oklahoma: 61 by 66.6. West Virginia: 43 by 54.3. Oklahoma State: 54 by 48.1. Texas Tech: 45 by 66.2. TCU: 30 by 42.5
Split Comparison
Wins224 · n=3 · -43.6 vs Losses
Losses267.6 · n=8 · +43.6 vs Wins
First Half253 · n=6 · -13.5 vs Second Half
Second Half266.5 · n=6 · +13.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Texas
Best efficiency game
70.8 vs Unknown
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/26 | @ TCU | L 14-62 | 12 | 24 | 106 | 50.0 | 1 | 1 | 42.5 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| Sun 11/20 | vs Texas Tech | L 10-14 | 23 | 35 | 294 | 65.7 | 1 | 0 | 66.2 | 10 | 29 | 2.90 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 11/12 | @ Oklahoma State | L 14-20 | 28 | 42 | 274 | 66.7 | 1 | 3 | 48.1 | 12 | -9 | -0.80 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 11/5 | vs West Virginia | W 31-14 | 24 | 36 | 219 | 66.7 | 2 | 0 | 54.3 | 7 | -12 | -1.70 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/29 | vs Oklahoma300-yard game | L 13-27 | 37 | 57 | 308 | 64.9 | 1 | 3 | 66.6 | 4 | 31 | 7.80 | 0 | 28 |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Texas300-yard game · 3+ TD | L 21-24 | 25 | 36 | 329 | 69.4 | 2 | 1 | 68 | 8 | 30 | 3.80 | 1 | 11 |
| Sat 10/8 | vs Kansas State | L 9-10 | 22 | 38 | 198 | 57.9 | 0 | 0 | 59.7 | 4 | 15 | 3.80 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Kansas | L 11-14 | 30 | 48 | 287 | 62.5 | 1 | 1 | 51 | 9 | -21 | -2.30 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Baylor | L 24-31 | 23 | 36 | 284 | 63.9 | 2 | 2 | 51.9 | 11 | -14 | -1.30 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Ohio3+ TD | W 43-10 | 28 | 36 | 268 | 77.8 | 3 | 0 | 60 | 6 | -1 | -0.20 | 1 | 10 |
| Sat 9/10 | @ Iowa | W 10-7 | 25 | 38 | 184 | 65.8 | 1 | 2 | 50.2 | 9 | 14 | 1.60 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Unknown3+ TD | — | 25 | 31 | 293 | 80.6 | 4 | 1 | 70.8 | 3 | 11 | 3.70 | 0 | 7 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Iowa State
2020-2023
Opening stop
Season Progression
2020202120222023
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 Regular Season | Iowa State | 130 | 80.4 | 3.4 | — |
| 2021 Regular Season | Iowa State | 254 | 63.3 | 3.9 | 124 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Iowa State | 3,117 | 57.4 | 22.8 | 2,863 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Iowa State | 0 | — | — | -3,117 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Kansas
Win with 55 yards of offense and 100 efficiency.
55
Primary metric
55 total offense with 100 efficiency.
#2
Iowa
114
Primary metric
Loss with 114 yards of offense and 76 efficiency.
114 total offense with 76 efficiency.
#3
Texas
359
Primary metric
Loss with 359 yards of offense and 68 efficiency.
359 total offense with 68 efficiency.
#4
Texas Tech
323
Primary metric
Loss with 323 yards of offense and 66.2 efficiency.
323 total offense with 66.2 efficiency.
#5
Kansas State
68
Primary metric
Win with 68 yards of offense and 71.3 efficiency.
68 total offense with 71.3 efficiency.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2022 Regular Season · Iowa State
3,117 primary output · 57.4 efficiency · 22.8 usage
65.6
#2
2020 Regular Season · Iowa State
39.2
130 primary · 80.4 efficiency · 3.4 usage
#3
2021 Regular Season · Iowa State
34
254 primary · 63.3 efficiency · 3.9 usage
Milestones
8
250+ passing yards
4
300+ total offense
2
3+ takeover TD games
11
Above avg efficiency
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2020 · Rating 0.9006
West Sioux · Hawarden, IA
- Committed To
- Iowa State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2020
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
3,501
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 19 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.