Player Stats

Dallas Turner College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
120
TFL
33.5
Sacks
23.5
QB hurries
26
Passes defended
1

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2021 PostseasonAlabama11533--057.1
2021 Regular SeasonAlabama112575.55-057.1
2022 Regular SeasonAlabama1237848-043.4
2023 PostseasonAlabama14311--075.1
2023 Regular SeasonAlabama145014.510131075.1

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason

Alabama paired 40.5 primary output with 42.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

2023 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 42.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Ole Miss

Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2023 Postseason · Alabama

Games

14

Havoc Plays / G

2.9

Efficiency

42.9

Usage

16.8

Consistency

57.3

Best Game by takeover score

Ole Miss

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011121314

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Michigan: 2. Middle Tennessee: 4.5. Texas: 1. South Florida: 5. Ole Miss: 7.5. Mississippi State: 2. Texas A&M: 3.5. Arkansas: 3. Tennessee: 3. LSU: 2. Kentucky: 0. Chattanooga: 1. Auburn: 4. Georgia: 2

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Michigan: 3 by 32.5. Middle Tennessee: 2 by 53.3. Texas: 3 by 22.5. South Florida: 7 by 79.2. Ole Miss: 5 by 70.8. Mississippi State: 5 by 40.8. Texas A&M: 4 by 51.7. Arkansas: 3 by 42.5. Tennessee: 5 by 50.8. LSU: 4 by 36.7. Kentucky: 1 by 4.2. Chattanooga: 3 by 22.5. Auburn: 4 by 56.7. Georgia: 4 by 36.7

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins3.1 · Games = 12 · +1.6 vs Losses
Losses1.5 · Games = 2 · -1.6 vs Wins