Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason
Arkansas State paired 689 primary output with 85.9 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Regular Season | Syracuse | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 33.7 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Syracuse | 4 | 10 | 69 | 0 | 46.1 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Syracuse | 11 | 37 | 389 | 5 | 63.5 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Syracuse | 8 | 15 | 201 | 1 | 56 |
| 2023 Postseason | Arkansas State | 13 | 1 | 31 | 0 | 78.6 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Arkansas State | 13 | 38 | 658 | 9 | 78.6 |
| 2024 Postseason | Arkansas State | 13 | 4 | 49 | 2 | 67.8 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Arkansas State | 13 | 38 | 445 | 4 | 67.8 |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason
Arkansas State paired 689 primary output with 85.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2024 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 78 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2024 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Syracuse, Arkansas State.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UL Monroe
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
38
Efficiency
78
Usage
16.4
Consistency
66.9
Best Game by takeover score
UL Monroe
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Bowling Green: 49. Central Arkansas: 69. Tulsa: 20. Michigan: 41. Iowa State: 20. South Alabama: 19. Texas State: 27. Southern Miss: 55. Troy: 23. Louisiana: 27. Georgia State: 40. UL Monroe: 69. Old Dominion: 35
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Bowling Green: 4 by 81.7. Central Arkansas: 5 by 92. Tulsa: 3 by 44.4. Michigan: 5 by 54.7. Iowa State: 1 by 100. South Alabama: 2 by 63.3. Texas State: 2 by 90. Southern Miss: 3 by 100. Troy: 2 by 76.7. Louisiana: 4 by 45. Georgia State: 3 by 88.9. UL Monroe: 6 by 76.7. Old Dominion: 2 by 100
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.