Player Stats

Torey Richardson College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
77
TFL
6
Sacks
1.5
Passes defended
16

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2019 Regular SeasonHouston22-0--036.7
2021 PostseasonUTEP12321-1047
2021 Regular SeasonUTEP1223-0-6047
2022 Regular SeasonUTEP00-0--0-
2023 Regular SeasonUTEP112630.5-6052
2024 Regular SeasonTemple92310-3030.9

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season

UTEP paired 10.5 primary output with 19.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

2024 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 16.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2024 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 3 team stops, with role shifts visible across Houston, UTEP, Temple.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Utah State

Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2024 Regular Season · Temple

Games

9

Havoc Plays / G

0.6

Efficiency

16.2

Usage

5.7

Consistency

14.8

Best Game by takeover score

Utah State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Oklahoma: 0. Coastal Carolina: 0. Utah State: 2. UConn: 1. Tulsa: 0. East Carolina: 0. Tulane: 1. Florida Atlantic: 1. UTSA: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oklahoma: 3 by 12.5. Coastal Carolina: 2 by 8.3. Utah State: 3 by 32.5. UConn: 1 by 14.2. Tulsa: 4 by 16.7. East Carolina: 3 by 12.5. Tulane: 2 by 18.3. Florida Atlantic: 4 by 26.7. UTSA: 1 by 4.2

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins1 · Games = 3 · +0.7 vs Losses
Losses0.3 · Games = 6 · -0.7 vs Wins