Player Stats

Anthony Romphf College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
25
TFL
1
Passes defended
5

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2020 Regular SeasonPurdue00-0--0-
2021 Regular SeasonPurdue00-0--0-
2022 Regular SeasonWestern Michigan81710-1020.5
2023 Regular SeasonWestern Michigan58-0-4041.4
2025 Regular SeasonTulsa00-0--0-

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season

Western Michigan paired 5 primary output with 18.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

2023 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 18.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2025 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 3 team stops, with role shifts visible across Purdue, Western Michigan, Tulsa.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Miami (OH)

Loss with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2023 Regular Season · Western Michigan

Games

5

Havoc Plays / G

1

Efficiency

18.7

Usage

4

Consistency

13.3

Best Game by takeover score

Miami (OH)

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Mississippi State: 0. Miami (OH): 4. Ohio: 0. Central Michigan: 0. Bowling Green: 1

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Mississippi State: 1 by 4.2. Miami (OH): 3 by 52.5. Ohio: 3 by 12.5. Central Michigan: 1 by 4.2

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0 · Games = 1 · -1.3 vs Losses
Losses1.3 · Games = 4 · +1.3 vs Wins