Usage Score
5.9
Player Dossier
2020-2024UTSA
Jamal Ligon
LB • 6'2" • 235 lbs • Tyler, TX, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Jamal Ligon shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 24.4 disruption score.
Efficiency
24.4
Consistency
51.3
Season Value
24.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason · UTSA
202121222223232424
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 9
- Program Path
- UTSA
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Middle Tennessee
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jamal Ligon, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason · UTSA. Jamal Ligon shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 24.4 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason
UTSA paired 12.5 primary output with 24.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2024 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 24.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2024 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Tulsa
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2024 Postseason · UTSA
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
1.0
Efficiency
24.4
Usage
5.9
Consistency
51.3
Best Game by takeover score
Coastal Carolina
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Coastal Carolina: 2. Kennesaw State: 1. Texas State: 1. Texas: 0. Unknown: 0. East Carolina: 2. Rice: 0. Florida Atlantic: 0. Tulsa: 3. Memphis: 1. North Texas: 2. Temple: 0.5. Army: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Coastal Carolina: 2 by 28.3. Kennesaw State: 3 by 22.5. Texas State: 2 by 18.3. Texas: 5 by 20.8. Unknown: 2 by 8.3. East Carolina: 5 by 40.8. Rice: 2 by 8.3. Florida Atlantic: 3 by 12.5. Tulsa: 4 by 46.7. Memphis: 6 by 35. North Texas: 4 by 36.7. Temple: 4 by 21.7. Army: 4 by 16.7
Split Comparison
Wins1.1 · n=6 · +0.1 vs Losses
Losses1 · n=6 · -0.1 vs Wins
First Half0.9 · n=7 · -0.2 vs Second Half
Second Half1.1 · n=6 · +0.2 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Tulsa
Best efficiency game
46.7 vs Tulsa
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 12/23 | vs Coastal Carolina | W 44-15 | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/30 | @ Army | L 24-29 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/23 | vs Temple | W 51-27 | 4 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/16 | vs North Texas | W 48-27 | 4 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/2 | vs Memphis | W 44-36 | 6 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/26 | @ Tulsa | L 45-46 | 4 | 4 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/19 | vs Florida Atlantic | W 38-24 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/12 | @ Rice | L 27-29 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/28 | @ East Carolina | L 20-30 | 5 | 3 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/21 | vs Unknown | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/14 | @ Texas | L 7-56 | 5 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/7 | @ Texas State | L 10-49 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 8/31 | vs Kennesaw State | W 28-16 | 3 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UTSA
2020-2024
Opening stop
Season Progression
202020212021202220222023202320242024
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 Regular Season | UTSA | 12.5 | 36 | 9.5 | — |
| 2021 Postseason | UTSA | 5 | 26.4 | 6.3 | -7.5 |
| 2021 Regular Season | UTSA | 5 | 26.4 | 6.3 | 0 |
| 2022 Postseason | UTSA | 8 | 33.1 | 7.3 | 3 |
| 2022 Regular Season | UTSA | 8 | 33.1 | 7.3 | 0 |
| 2023 Postseason | UTSA | 9 | 26.8 | 7.3 | 1 |
| 2023 Regular Season | UTSA | 9 | 26.8 | 7.3 | 0 |
| 2024 Postseason | UTSA | 12.5 | 24.4 | 5.9 | 3.5 |
| 2024 Regular Season | UTSA | 12.5 | 24.4 | 5.9 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Middle Tennessee
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3
Primary metric
3 disruption/tackle impact with 67.5 takeover score.
#2
Tulane
3.5
Primary metric
Loss with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3.5 disruption/tackle impact with 65.3 takeover score.
#3
Louisiana Tech
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 59.4 takeover score.
#4
Southern Miss
2.5
Primary metric
Win with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 55.2 takeover score.
#5
San Diego State
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 53.1 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2024 Postseason · UTSA
12.5 primary output · 24.4 efficiency · 5.9 usage
24.3
#2
2024 Regular Season · UTSA
24.3
12.5 primary · 24.4 efficiency · 5.9 usage
#3
2022 Postseason · UTSA
23.8
8 primary · 33.1 efficiency · 7.3 usage
Milestones
2
Impact games
1
Splash games
4
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2020 · Rating 0.837
Tyler Lee · Tyler, TX
- Committed To
- UTSA
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2020
Career Facts
1
Career teams
9
Seasons tracked
328
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 9 tracked seasons, 62 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.