Usage Score
15.6
Player Dossier
2020-2025Vanderbilt
Rocko Griffin
RB • 5'9" • 200 lbs • Rincon, GA, USA
Balanced backfield optionSteady chain mover
Rocko Griffin leans balanced backfield option traits and 43.5 efficiency.
Efficiency
43.5
Consistency
36.9
Season Value
37.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason · UTSA
20212223232425
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 3
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Vanderbilt • UTSA • Massachusetts
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Temple
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Rocko Griffin, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason · UTSA. Rocko Griffin leans balanced backfield option traits and 43.5 efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason
UTSA paired 513 primary output with 54.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 43.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2025 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 3 team stops, with role shifts visible across Vanderbilt, UTSA, Massachusetts.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Temple
Loss with 94 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Regular Season · Massachusetts
Games
9
Scrimmage Yards / G
34
Efficiency
43.5
Usage
15.6
Consistency
36.9
Best Game by takeover score
Bowling Green
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Temple: 94. Unknown: 19. Iowa: 37. Missouri: 23. Central Michigan: 83. Akron: 13. Northern Illinois: 5. Ohio: 6. Bowling Green: 26
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Temple: 10 by 89.2. Unknown: 11 by 19.7. Iowa: 12 by 30.3. Missouri: 5 by 47.9. Central Michigan: 11 by 81.4. Akron: 4 by 13.5. Northern Illinois: 3 by 17.4. Ohio: 4 by 6.3. Bowling Green: 3 by 86.1
Split Comparison
Losses35.9 · n=8
First Half51.2 · n=5 · +38.7 vs Second Half
Second Half12.5 · n=4 · -38.7 vs First Half
All Games34 · n=9
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Temple
Best efficiency game
89.2 vs Temple
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 11/25 | vs Bowling Green | L 14-45 | 3 | 26 | 8.70 | 0 | — | — | 8.7 |
| Wed 11/19 | @ Ohio | L 14-42 | 2 | -2 | -1 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 1.5 |
| Thu 11/13 | vs Northern Illinois | L 3-45 | 3 | 5 | 1.70 | 0 | — | — | 1.7 |
| Wed 11/5 | @ Akron | L 10-44 | 3 | -5 | -1.70 | 0 | 1 | 18 | 3.3 |
| Sat 10/25 | @ Central Michigan | L 13-38 | 7 | 56 | 8 | 1 | 4 | 27 | 7.5 |
| Sat 9/27 | @ Missouri | L 6-42 | 5 | 23 | 4.60 | 0 | — | — | 4.6 |
| Sat 9/13 | @ Iowa | L 7-47 | 10 | 28 | 2.80 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 3.1 |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Unknown | — | 10 | 20 | 2 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 1.7 |
| Sat 8/30 | vs Temple | L 10-42 | 10 | 94 | 9.40 | 1 | — | — | 9.4 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Vanderbilt
2020-2022
Opening stop
- 2
UTSA
2023-2024
Peak year stop
- 3
Massachusetts
2025
Final stop
Season Progression
2020202120222023202320242025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 Regular Season | Vanderbilt | 94 | 30.4 | 11.5 | — |
| 2021 Regular Season | Vanderbilt | 558 | 32 | 31.1 | 464 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Vanderbilt | 86 | 69.2 | 5.8 | -472 |
| 2023 Postseason | UTSA | 513 | 54.1 | 13.6 | 427 |
| 2023 Regular Season | UTSA | 513 | 54.1 | 13.6 | 0 |
| 2024 Regular Season | UTSA | 60 | 40.8 | 8.6 | -453 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Massachusetts | 306 | 43.5 | 15.6 | 246 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Temple
Loss with 94 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
94
Primary metric
94 scrimmage yards and 21.3 usage.
#2
East Carolina
80
Primary metric
Win with 80 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
80 scrimmage yards and 11.5 usage.
#3
Hawai'i
63
Primary metric
Win with 63 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
63 scrimmage yards and 8.3 usage.
#4
Central Michigan
83
Primary metric
Loss with 83 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
83 scrimmage yards and 23.4 usage.
#5
Rice
81
Primary metric
Win with 81 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
81 scrimmage yards and 20.3 usage.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2023 Postseason · UTSA
513 primary output · 54.1 efficiency · 13.6 usage
56.3
#2
2023 Regular Season · UTSA
56.3
513 primary · 54.1 efficiency · 13.6 usage
#3
2021 Regular Season · Vanderbilt
55.2
558 primary · 32 efficiency · 31.1 usage
Milestones
3
100+ rush yards
0
150+ scrimmage yards
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2026 · Rating 0.8935
Peters Township · Canonsburg, PA
- Committed To
- Pittsburgh
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2026
Career Facts
3
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
1,617
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 42 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.