Player Stats

Jabari Small College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
2,365
Rushing yards
2,118
Receiving yards
247
Touchdowns
26

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2020 Regular SeasonTennessee614111724036
2021 PostseasonTennessee111821802171.3
2021 Regular SeasonTennessee1168761275871.3
2022 PostseasonTennessee1338380168.8
2022 Regular SeasonTennessee138026961061468.8
2023 Regular SeasonTennessee1151547540253.9

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason

Tennessee paired 869 primary output with 60.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

2023 Regular Season role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 50.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2023 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Austin Peay

Win with 109 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2023 Regular Season · Tennessee

Games

11

Scrimmage Yards / G

46.8

Efficiency

50.3

Usage

16

Consistency

60.4

Best Game by takeover score

Austin Peay

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Virginia: 80. Austin Peay: 109. Florida: 36. UTSA: 61. South Carolina: 59. Texas A&M: 42. Alabama: 24. Kentucky: 40. Missouri: 5. Georgia: 29. Vanderbilt: 30

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Virginia: 16 by 53. Austin Peay: 14 by 78.1. Florida: 8 by 50. UTSA: 9 by 70.6. South Carolina: 11 by 55.9. Texas A&M: 12 by 36.5. Alabama: 8 by 31.3. Kentucky: 10 by 38.9. Missouri: 3 by 17.4. Georgia: 7 by 43.3. Vanderbilt: 4 by 78.1

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins60.1 · Games = 7 · +36.6 vs Losses
Losses23.5 · Games = 4 · -36.6 vs Wins