Usage Score
12.6
Player Dossier
2020-2025Wake Forest
Sawyer Racanelli
WR • 6'3" • 208 lbs • Brush Prairie, WA, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Sawyer Racanelli reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
85.9
Consistency
33.2
Season Value
57.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season · Washington
20212525
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Washington • Wake Forest
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Duke
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Sawyer Racanelli, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season · Washington. Sawyer Racanelli reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Sawyer Racanelli played WR for Washington and Wake Forest. Across 3 tracked seasons, Sawyer Racanelli recorded 315 receiving yards, 5 tackles, and 1 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2025 with Wake Forest.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season
Washington paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 85.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Washington, Wake Forest.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Duke
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Postseason · Wake Forest
Games
7
Receiving Yards / G
45
Efficiency
85.9
Usage
12.6
Consistency
33.2
Best Game by takeover score
Mississippi State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Mississippi State: 25. Georgia Tech: 16. Virginia Tech: 88. Florida State: 27. North Carolina: 29. Delaware: 7. Duke: 123
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Mississippi State: 1 by 100. Georgia Tech: 1 by 100. Virginia Tech: 3 by 100. Florida State: 2 by 90. North Carolina: 3 by 64.4. Delaware: 1 by 46.7. Duke: 7 by 100
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins37.3 · Games = 4 · -18.1 vs Losses
Losses55.3 · Games = 3 · +18.1 vs Wins
First Half39 · Games = 4 · -14 vs Second Half
Second Half53 · Games = 3 · +14 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
7 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Duke
Best efficiency game
100 vs Mississippi State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 1/3 | @ Mississippi State | W 43-29 | — | 1 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 11/29 | @ Duke100 receiving yards | L 32-49 | — | 7 | 123 | 17.6 | 17.60 | 1 | 22 |
| Sat 11/22 | vs Delaware | W 52-14 | — | 1 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 11/15 | vs North Carolina | W 28-12 | — | 3 | 29 | 9.7 | 9.70 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 11/1 | @ Florida State | L 7-42 | — | 2 | 27 | 13.5 | 13.50 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 10/4 | @ Virginia Tech | W 30-23 | — | 3 | 88 | 29.3 | 29.30 | 0 | 62 |
| Sat 9/27 | vs Georgia Tech | L 29-30 | — | 1 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 16 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Washington
2020-2021
Opening stop
- 2
Wake Forest
2025
Final stop
Season Progression
2020202120252025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 Regular Season | Washington | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2021 Regular Season | Washington | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2025 Postseason | Wake Forest | 315 | 85.9 | 12.6 | 315 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 315 | 85.9 | 12.6 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Duke
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
123
Primary metric
123 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Virginia Tech
88
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
88 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Mississippi State
25
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
25 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Florida State
27
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
27 receiving yards with a 90 efficiency score.
#5
Georgia Tech
16
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
16 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2021 Regular Season · Washington
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2025 Postseason · Wake Forest
57.9
315 primary · 85.9 efficiency · 12.6 usage
#3
2025 Regular Season · Wake Forest
57.9
315 primary · 85.9 efficiency · 12.6 usage
Milestones
1
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2026 · Rating 0.9149
Parker · Birmingham, AL
- Committed To
- North Carolina
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2026
Career Facts
2
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
315
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 11 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.