Player Stats

Jamal Potts College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
224
TFL
14
Sacks
2.5
QB hurries
4
Passes defended
14

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2020 Regular SeasonFlorida International00-0--0-
2021 Regular SeasonFlorida International934-0-1012.2
2022 Regular SeasonFlorida International12565.5125062.3
2023 Regular SeasonFlorida International105350.5-2048.4
2024 Regular SeasonFlorida International12813.5126064.3

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season

Florida International paired 13.5 primary output with 38.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

2024 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 38.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2024 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Central Michigan

Win with 5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2024 Regular Season · Florida International

Games

12

Havoc Plays / G

1.1

Efficiency

38.3

Usage

8.4

Consistency

49.1

Best Game by takeover score

Central Michigan

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Indiana: 2. Central Michigan: 5. Florida Atlantic: 0. Monmouth: 0. Louisiana Tech: 1. Liberty: 1. UTEP: 0. Sam Houston: 0. New Mexico State: 0. Jacksonville State: 1.5. Kennesaw State: 2. Middle Tennessee: 1

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Indiana: 3 by 32.5. Central Michigan: 9 by 87.5. Florida Atlantic: 6 by 25. Monmouth: 4 by 16.7. Louisiana Tech: 6 by 35. Liberty: 7 by 39.2. UTEP: 9 by 37.5. Sam Houston: 6 by 25. New Mexico State: 4 by 16.7. Jacksonville State: 15 by 65. Kennesaw State: 8 by 53.3. Middle Tennessee: 4 by 26.7

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins1.8 · Games = 4 · +0.9 vs Losses
Losses0.8 · Games = 8 · -0.9 vs Wins