Usage Score
5.3
Player Dossier
2020-2022Memphis
WR • 5'10" • 165 lbs • Spring Hill, TN, USA
Andrew Mason reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
5.3
Efficiency
80
Consistency
100
Season Value
50.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season · Rice
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Andrew Mason, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season · Rice. Andrew Mason reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Andrew Mason played WR for Rice and Memphis. Across 3 tracked seasons, Andrew Mason recorded 1 rushing yards and 86 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2020 with Rice.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season
Rice paired 74 primary output with 66.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2021 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 80 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2022 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Rice, Memphis.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UTEP
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
1
Receiving Yards / G
12
Efficiency
80
Usage
5.3
Consistency
100
Best Game by takeover score
UTEP
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
1 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
UTEP
Best efficiency game
80 vs UTEP
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/20 | @ UTEP | L 28-38 | — | 1 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Rice
2020-2021
Opening stop
Memphis
2022
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 Regular Season | Rice | 74 | 66.7 | 15.1 | — |
| 2021 Regular Season | Rice | 12 | 80 | 5.3 | -62 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Memphis | 0 | — | — | -12 |
#1 Featured game
Southern Miss
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
44
Primary metric
44 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
UTEP
12
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
12 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
#3
Marshall
20
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
20 receiving yards with a 66.7 efficiency score.
#4
North Texas
10
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
10 receiving yards with a 33.3 efficiency score.
#5
UAB
0
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
0 receiving yards with a — efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2020 Regular Season · Rice
74 primary output · 66.7 efficiency · 15.1 usage
56.7
#2
2021 Regular Season · Rice
50.3
12 primary · 80 efficiency · 5.3 usage
#3
2022 Regular Season · Memphis
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2020 · Rating 0.8222
Ravenwood · Brentwood, TN
Career Facts
2
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
86
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 5 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.