Player Stats

DJ Lundy College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
193
TFL
17.5
Sacks
5
QB hurries
3
Passes defended
9
Touchdowns
4

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2020 Regular SeasonFlorida State6120.50.5--09.7
2021 Regular SeasonFlorida State12695112047.4
2022 PostseasonFlorida State130-0--034.3
2022 Regular SeasonFlorida State134351.5-3334.3
2023 Regular SeasonFlorida State12526224163.9
2024 Regular SeasonFlorida State41710--022.2

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season

Florida State paired 15 primary output with 30.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

2024 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 20.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2024 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Georgia Tech

Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2024 Regular Season · Florida State

Games

4

Havoc Plays / G

0.3

Efficiency

20.2

Usage

6.5

Consistency

8.3

Best Game by takeover score

Georgia Tech

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Georgia Tech: 1. Memphis: 0. California: 0. SMU: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Georgia Tech: 7 by 39.2. Memphis: 3 by 12.5. California: 3 by 12.5. SMU: 4 by 16.7

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0 · Games = 1 · -0.3 vs Losses
Losses0.3 · Games = 3 · +0.3 vs Wins