Usage Score
20.8
Player Dossier
2020-2024Iowa
Luke Lachey
TE • 6'6" • 247 lbs • Columbus, OH, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Luke Lachey reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
51.9
Consistency
51.6
Season Value
46.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season · Iowa
2021212222232424
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- Iowa
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Nebraska
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Luke Lachey, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season · Iowa. Luke Lachey reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Luke Lachey played TE for Iowa. Across 5 tracked seasons, Luke Lachey recorded 893 receiving yards, 2 tackles, and 4 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2022 with Iowa.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season
Iowa paired 131 primary output with 84.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2024 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 51.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2024 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2024 Postseason · Iowa
Games
10
Receiving Yards / G
23.1
Efficiency
51.9
Usage
20.8
Consistency
51.6
Best Game by takeover score
Missouri
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Missouri: 4. Unknown: 63. Troy: 25. Minnesota: 9. Ohio State: 39. Washington: 20. Michigan State: 36. Northwestern: 17. Maryland: 9. Nebraska: 9
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Missouri: 1 by 26.7. Unknown: 6 by 70. Troy: 3 by 55.6. Minnesota: 3 by 20. Ohio State: 5 by 52. Washington: 2 by 66.7. Michigan State: 2 by 100. Northwestern: 3 by 37.8. Maryland: 1 by 60. Nebraska: 2 by 30
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins14.8 · Games = 6 · -11.5 vs Losses
Losses26.3 · Games = 3 · +11.5 vs Wins
First Half28 · Games = 5 · +9.8 vs Second Half
Second Half18.2 · Games = 5 · -9.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Unknown
Best efficiency game
100 vs Michigan State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 12/30 | @ Missouri | L 24-27 | — | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 11/30 | vs Nebraska | W 13-10 | — | 2 | 9 | 4.5 | 4.50 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 11/23 | @ Maryland | W 29-13 | — | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Northwestern | W 40-14 | — | 3 | 17 | 5.7 | 5.70 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 10/19 | @ Michigan State | L 20-32 | — | 2 | 36 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 28 |
| Sat 10/12 | vs Washington | W 40-16 | — | 2 | 20 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/5 | @ Ohio State | L 7-35 | — | 5 | 39 | 7.8 | 7.80 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 9/21 | @ Minnesota | W 31-14 | — | 3 | 9 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Troy | W 38-21 | — | 3 | 25 | 8.3 | 8.30 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 8/31 | vs Unknown | — | — | 6 | 63 | 10.5 | 10.50 | 0 | 19 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Iowa
2020-2024
Opening stop
Season Progression
20202021202120222022202320242024
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 Regular Season | Iowa | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2021 Postseason | Iowa | 133 | 95.6 | 8.7 | 133 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Iowa | 133 | 95.6 | 8.7 | 0 |
| 2022 Postseason | Iowa | 398 | 69.5 | 15.6 | 265 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Iowa | 398 | 69.5 | 15.6 | 0 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Iowa | 131 | 84.8 | 32 | -267 |
| 2024 Postseason | Iowa | 231 | 51.9 | 20.8 | 100 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Iowa | 231 | 51.9 | 20.8 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Nebraska
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
89
Primary metric
89 receiving yards with a 84.8 efficiency score.
#2
Minnesota
77
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
77 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Michigan
84
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
84 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Utah State
73
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
73 receiving yards with a 69.5 efficiency score.
#5
Nebraska
27
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
27 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2023 Regular Season · Iowa
131 primary output · 84.8 efficiency · 32 usage
62.1
#2
2021 Postseason · Iowa
55.5
133 primary · 95.6 efficiency · 8.7 usage
#3
2021 Regular Season · Iowa
55.5
133 primary · 95.6 efficiency · 8.7 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2025 · Rating 0.8196
Kings · Kings Mills, OH
- Committed To
- Eastern Michigan
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2025
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
893
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 30 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.