Player Stats

Isaiah Jacobs College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
1,177
Rushing yards
930
Receiving yards
247
Touchdowns
8

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2020 Regular SeasonMaryland4836122030.5
2021 Regular SeasonMaryland516311647041.3
2023 Regular SeasonUAB531224963361.1
2024 Regular SeasonUAB419516233051.4
2025 Regular SeasonUAB1242434282562.5

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season

UAB paired 424 primary output with 45.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

2025 Regular Season role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 45.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2025 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Maryland, UAB.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Tulsa

Win with 84 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2025 Regular Season · UAB

Games

12

Scrimmage Yards / G

35.3

Efficiency

45.2

Usage

13.5

Consistency

66.3

Best Game by takeover score

Tulsa

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Alabama State: 44. Navy: 16. Akron: 37. Tennessee: 43. Army: 31. Florida Atlantic: 55. Memphis: 24. UConn: 19. Rice: 6. North Texas: 27. South Florida: 38. Tulsa: 84

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Alabama State: 9 by 53.2. Navy: 5 by 33.3. Akron: 6 by 64.2. Tennessee: 11 by 36.1. Army: 3 by 68.1. Florida Atlantic: 13 by 39.9. Memphis: 8 by 31.3. UConn: 5 by 40.8. Rice: 4 by 18.8. North Texas: 10 by 27.9. South Florida: 6 by 66. Tulsa: 14 by 62.5

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins47.3 · Games = 4 · +17.9 vs Losses
Losses29.4 · Games = 8 · -17.9 vs Wins