Usage Score
13.5
Player Dossier
2020-2025UAB
RB • 5'10" • 220 lbs • Tulsa, OK, USA
Isaiah Jacobs leans balanced backfield option traits and 45.2 efficiency.
Usage Score
13.5
Efficiency
45.2
Consistency
66.3
Season Value
55.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · UAB
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Isaiah Jacobs, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · UAB. Isaiah Jacobs leans balanced backfield option traits and 45.2 efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season
UAB paired 424 primary output with 45.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 45.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2025 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Maryland, UAB.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Tulsa
Win with 84 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Scrimmage Yards / G
35.3
Efficiency
45.2
Usage
13.5
Consistency
66.3
Best Game by takeover score
Tulsa
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 44. Navy: 16. Akron: 37. Tennessee: 43. Army: 31. Florida Atlantic: 55. Memphis: 24. UConn: 19. Rice: 6. North Texas: 27. South Florida: 38. Tulsa: 84
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 9 by 53.2. Navy: 5 by 33.3. Akron: 6 by 64.2. Tennessee: 11 by 36.1. Army: 3 by 68.1. Florida Atlantic: 13 by 39.9. Memphis: 8 by 31.3. UConn: 5 by 40.8. Rice: 4 by 18.8. North Texas: 10 by 27.9. South Florida: 6 by 66. Tulsa: 14 by 62.5
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Tulsa
Best efficiency game
68.1 vs Army
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/29 | @ Tulsa | W 31-24 | 14 | 84 | 6 | 0 | — | — | 6 |
| Sat 11/22 | vs South Florida | L 18-48 | 6 | 38 | 6.30 | 1 | — | — | 6.3 |
| Sat 11/15 | vs North Texas | L 24-53 | 9 | 24 | 2.70 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2.7 |
| Sat 11/8 | @ Rice | L 17-24 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1.5 |
| Sat 11/1 | @ UConn | L 19-38 | 3 | 12 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 3.8 |
| Sat 10/18 | vs Memphis | W 31-24 | 8 | 24 | 3 | 0 | — | — | 3 |
| Sat 10/11 | @ Florida Atlantic | L 33-53 | 9 | 32 | 3.60 | 0 | 4 | 23 | 4.2 |
| Sat 10/4 | vs Army | L 13-31 | 2 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 23 | 10.3 |
| Sat 9/20 | @ Tennessee | L 24-56 | 6 | 19 | 3.20 | 1 | 5 | 24 | 3.9 |
| Sun 9/14 | vs Akron | W 31-28 | 6 | 37 | 6.20 | 0 | — | — | 6.2 |
| Sat 9/6 | @ Navy | L 24-38 | 5 | 16 | 3.20 | 0 | — | — | 3.2 |
| Fri 8/29 | vs Unknown | — | 8 | 42 | 5.30 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4.9 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Maryland
2020-2021
Opening stop
UAB
2023-2025
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 Regular Season | Maryland | 83 | 35.2 | 12.1 | — |
| 2021 Regular Season | Maryland | 163 | 45.4 | 11.9 | 80 |
| 2023 Regular Season | UAB | 312 | 45.8 | 22.7 | 149 |
| 2024 Regular Season | UAB | 195 | 39 | 19.3 | -117 |
| 2025 Regular Season | UAB | 424 | 45.2 | 13.5 | 229 |
#1 Featured game
Tulane
Loss with 106 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
106
Primary metric
106 scrimmage yards and 31.8 usage.
#2
Tulsa
84
Primary metric
Win with 84 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
84 scrimmage yards and 20.3 usage.
#3
Indiana
54
Primary metric
Loss with 54 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
54 scrimmage yards and 19 usage.
#4
Arkansas
74
Primary metric
Loss with 74 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
74 scrimmage yards and 29.3 usage.
#5
Unknown
72
Primary metric
Game with 72 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
72 scrimmage yards and 19.7 usage.
#1 Season by value score
2025 Regular Season · UAB
424 primary output · 45.2 efficiency · 13.5 usage
55.8
#2
2023 Regular Season · UAB
50.3
312 primary · 45.8 efficiency · 22.7 usage
#3
2024 Regular Season · UAB
42.3
195 primary · 39 efficiency · 19.3 usage
1
100+ rush yards
0
150+ scrimmage yards
1
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2020 · Rating 0.8833
Owasso · Owasso, OK
Career Facts
2
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
1,177
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 30 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Isaiah Jacobs quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit