Usage Score
27.7
Player Dossier
2020-2024Texas State
WR • 5'11" • 180 lbs • San Clemente, CA, USA
Joey Hobert reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
27.7
Efficiency
63
Consistency
69.7
Season Value
60
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason · Texas State
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Joey Hobert, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason · Texas State. Joey Hobert reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Joey Hobert played WR for Washington State and Texas State. Across 4 tracked seasons, Joey Hobert recorded 5 rushing yards, 1,798 receiving yards, and 7 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2023 with Texas State.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason
Texas State paired 895 primary output with 73.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2024 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 63 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2024 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Washington State, Texas State.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Old Dominion
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 83.3th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
56.7
Efficiency
63
Usage
27.7
Consistency
69.7
Best Game by takeover score
North Texas
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. North Texas: 19. Unknown: 91. UTSA: 52. Arizona State: 47. Sam Houston: 75. Troy: 45. Arkansas State: 101. Old Dominion: 88. Louisiana: 14. UL Monroe: 13. Southern Miss: 55. South Alabama: 80
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. North Texas: 4 by 31.7. Unknown: 6 by 100. UTSA: 4 by 86.7. Arizona State: 8 by 39.2. Sam Houston: 8 by 62.5. Troy: 6 by 50. Arkansas State: 10 by 67.3. Old Dominion: 6 by 97.8. Louisiana: 3 by 31.1. UL Monroe: 4 by 21.7. Southern Miss: 4 by 91.7. South Alabama: 7 by 76.2
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Old Dominion
Best efficiency game
100 vs Unknown
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 1/3 | vs North Texas | W 30-28 | — | 4 | 19 | 4.8 | 4.80 | 0 | 11 |
| Fri 11/29 | @ South Alabama | W 45-38 | — | 7 | 80 | 11.4 | 11.40 | 1 | 24 |
| Sun 11/17 | vs Southern Miss | W 58-3 | — | 4 | 55 | 13.8 | 13.80 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 11/9 | @ UL Monroe | W 38-17 | — | 4 | 13 | 3.3 | 3.30 | 0 | 9 |
| Tue 10/29 | vs Louisiana | L 17-23 | — | 3 | 14 | 4.7 | 4.70 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 10/19 | @ Old Dominion | L 14-24 | — | 6 | 88 | 14.7 | 14.70 | 0 | 40 |
| Sat 10/12 | vs Arkansas State100 receiving yards · High volume | W 41-9 | — | 10 | 101 | 10.1 | 10.10 | 2 | 30 |
| Thu 10/3 | @ Troy | W 38-17 | — | 6 | 45 | 7.5 | 7.50 | 1 | 28 |
| Sat 9/28 | @ Sam HoustonHigh volume · 2+ TD | L 39-40 | — | 8 | 75 | 9.1 | 9.40 | 2 | 21 |
| Thu 9/12 | vs Arizona StateHigh volume | L 28-31 | — | 8 | 47 | 4.6 | 5.90 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs UTSA | W 49-10 | — | 4 | 52 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 24 |
| Sun 9/1 | vs Unknown2+ TD | — | — | 6 | 91 | 15.2 | 15.20 | 2 | 37 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Washington State
2020-2021
Opening stop
Texas State
2023-2024
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 Regular Season | Washington State | 31 | 68.9 | 12 | — |
| 2021 Postseason | Washington State | 192 | 76.5 | 7.6 | 161 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Washington State | 192 | 76.5 | 7.6 | 0 |
| 2023 Postseason | Texas State | 895 | 73.9 | 29.7 | 703 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Texas State | 895 | 73.9 | 29.7 | 0 |
| 2024 Postseason | Texas State | 680 | 63 | 27.7 | -215 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Texas State | 680 | 63 | 27.7 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
BYU
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
100
Primary metric
100 receiving yards with a 60.6 efficiency score.
#2
Southern Miss
126
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
126 receiving yards with a 84 efficiency score.
#3
Georgia Southern
141
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
141 receiving yards with a 72.3 efficiency score.
#4
Louisiana
132
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
132 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Old Dominion
88
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
88 receiving yards with a 97.8 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2023 Postseason · Texas State
895 primary output · 73.9 efficiency · 29.7 usage
67.7
#2
2023 Regular Season · Texas State
67.7
895 primary · 73.9 efficiency · 29.7 usage
#3
2024 Postseason · Texas State
60
680 primary · 63 efficiency · 27.7 usage
7
100+ receiving yards
9
8+ catch outings
5
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2026 · Rating 0.971
Oakland · Murfreesboro, TN
Career Facts
2
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
1,798
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 37 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.