Usage Score
11.4
Player Dossier
2020-2025Michigan
Matthew Hibner
TE • 6'5" • 252 lbs • Burke, VA, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Matthew Hibner reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
70.3
Consistency
61.2
Season Value
60.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason · Michigan
202122232324242525
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 9
- Program Path
- Michigan • SMU
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: California
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Matthew Hibner, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason · Michigan. Matthew Hibner reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason
Michigan paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 70.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Michigan, SMU.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: California
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Postseason · SMU
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
39.6
Efficiency
70.3
Usage
11.4
Consistency
61.2
Best Game by takeover score
Arizona
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Arizona: 85. Unknown: -2. Baylor: 32. Missouri State: 4. TCU: 15. Syracuse: 55. Clemson: 29. Miami: 36. Boston College: 37. Louisville: 58. California: 87
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Arizona: 2 by 100. Unknown: 1 by 0. Baylor: 2 by 100. Missouri State: 2 by 13.3. TCU: 3 by 33.3. Syracuse: 5 by 73.3. Clemson: 2 by 96.7. Miami: 4 by 60. Boston College: 1 by 100. Louisville: 4 by 96.7. California: 5 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins43.4 · n=7 · -1.2 vs Losses
Losses44.7 · n=3 · +1.2 vs Wins
First Half31.5 · n=6 · -17.9 vs Second Half
Second Half49.4 · n=5 · +17.9 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
California
Best efficiency game
100 vs Arizona
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 1/3 | vs Arizona | W 24-19 | — | 2 | 85 | 42.5 | 42.50 | 0 | 80 |
| Sun 11/30 | @ California | L 35-38 | — | 5 | 87 | 17.4 | 17.40 | 1 | 32 |
| Sat 11/22 | vs Louisville | W 38-6 | — | 4 | 58 | 14.5 | 14.50 | 0 | 33 |
| Sat 11/8 | @ Boston College | W 45-13 | — | 1 | 37 | 37 | 37 | 1 | 37 |
| Sat 11/1 | vs Miami | W 26-20 | — | 4 | 36 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Clemson | W 35-24 | — | 2 | 29 | 14.5 | 14.50 | 1 | 22 |
| Sat 10/4 | vs Syracuse | W 31-18 | — | 5 | 55 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 29 |
| Sat 9/20 | @ TCU | L 24-35 | — | 3 | 15 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 9 |
| Sat 9/13 | @ Missouri State | W 28-10 | — | 2 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Baylor | L 45-48 | — | 2 | 32 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 16 |
| Sun 8/31 | vs Unknown | — | — | 1 | -2 | -2 | -2 | 0 | 0 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Michigan
2020-2023
Opening stop
- 2
SMU
2024-2025
Final stop
Season Progression
202020212022202320232024202420252025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 Regular Season | Michigan | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2021 Regular Season | Michigan | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Michigan | 15 | 50 | 5.8 | 15 |
| 2023 Postseason | Michigan | 0 | — | — | -15 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Michigan | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2024 Postseason | SMU | 368 | 84.9 | 14.6 | 368 |
| 2024 Regular Season | SMU | 368 | 84.9 | 14.6 | 0 |
| 2025 Postseason | SMU | 436 | 70.3 | 11.4 | 68 |
| 2025 Regular Season | SMU | 436 | 70.3 | 11.4 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
California
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
87
Primary metric
87 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Pittsburgh
108
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
108 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Arizona
85
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
85 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Louisville
58
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
58 receiving yards with a 96.7 efficiency score.
#5
Colorado State
10
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
10 receiving yards with a 66.7 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2023 Postseason · Michigan
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2023 Regular Season · Michigan
100
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2024 Postseason · SMU
65.2
368 primary · 84.9 efficiency · 14.6 usage
Milestones
1
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2025 · Rating 0.8178
Bridgton Academy · Mercier, QC
- Committed To
- Florida
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2025
Career Facts
2
Career teams
9
Seasons tracked
819
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 9 tracked seasons, 26 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.