Player Stats

Romello Height College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
107
TFL
25.5
Sacks
16
QB hurries
23
Passes defended
1

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2020 Regular SeasonAuburn10-01-034.7
2021 PostseasonAuburn81-02-035
2021 Regular SeasonAuburn817302-035
2022 Regular SeasonUSC00-0--0-
2023 PostseasonUSC101-0--023.9
2023 Regular SeasonUSC1017541-023.9
2024 Regular SeasonGeorgia Tech11346.52.54-045
2025 PostseasonTexas Tech13511--073.7
2025 Regular SeasonTexas Tech1332108.5131073.7

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason

Texas Tech paired 34.5 primary output with 38.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

2025 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 38.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 4 team stops, with role shifts visible across Auburn, USC, Georgia Tech, Texas Tech.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Kent State

Win with 5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2025 Postseason · Texas Tech

Games

13

Havoc Plays / G

2.7

Efficiency

38.4

Usage

10.2

Consistency

71.3

Best Game by takeover score

Kent State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Oregon: 2. Arkansas-Pine Bluff: 3. Kent State: 5. Oregon State: 4. Utah: 0. Kansas: 4. Arizona State: 1. Oklahoma State: 2. Kansas State: 3. BYU: 3. UCF: 2. West Virginia: 3. BYU: 2.5

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oregon: 5 by 40.8. Arkansas-Pine Bluff: 1 by 34.2. Kent State: 2 by 58.3. Oregon State: 4 by 56.7. Utah: 1 by 4.2. Kansas: 6 by 65. Arizona State: 4 by 26.7. Oklahoma State: 1 by 24.2. Kansas State: 2 by 38.3. BYU: 4 by 46.7. UCF: 4 by 36.7. West Virginia: 2 by 38.3. BYU: 1 by 29.2

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins2.9 · Games = 11 · +1.4 vs Losses
Losses1.5 · Games = 2 · -1.4 vs Wins