Player Stats

Ceyair Wright College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
106
TFL
3
Sacks
1.5
QB hurries
1
Passes defended
15
Touchdowns
2

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2021 Regular SeasonUSC22-0--037.4
2022 Regular SeasonUSC1226-0-2016.7
2023 Regular SeasonUSC51010-2030.9
2024 PostseasonNebraska114-0-1056.6
2024 Regular SeasonNebraska11351115256.6
2025 PostseasonNebraska114-0--036.9
2025 Regular SeasonNebraska112510.5-5036.9

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason

Nebraska paired 11 primary output with 24.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

2025 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 16.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across USC, Nebraska.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: UCLA

Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 90.9th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2025 Postseason · Nebraska

Games

11

Havoc Plays / G

0.6

Efficiency

16.9

Usage

3

Consistency

46.4

Best Game by takeover score

UCLA

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Utah: 0. Akron: 1. Michigan: 2. Michigan State: 0. Maryland: 0.5. Minnesota: 1. Northwestern: 1. USC: 0. UCLA: 1. Penn State: 0. Iowa: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Utah: 4 by 16.7. Akron: 1 by 14.2. Michigan: 0 by 20. Michigan State: 1 by 4.2. Maryland: 4 by 21.7. Minnesota: 4 by 26.7. Northwestern: 4 by 26.7. USC: 2 by 8.3. UCLA: 4 by 26.7. Penn State: 3 by 12.5. Iowa: 2 by 8.3

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.7 · Games = 5 · +0.2 vs Losses
Losses0.5 · Games = 6 · -0.2 vs Wins