Player Stats

Mario Williams College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
2,276
Receptions
158
Touchdowns
17

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2021 PostseasonOklahoma11233053.6
2021 Regular SeasonOklahoma1133347453.6
2022 PostseasonUSC10641061.9
2022 Regular SeasonUSC1028519561.9
2023 Regular SeasonUSC1129305250.1
2024 PostseasonTulane14691187.7
2024 Regular SeasonTulane1454940587.7

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason

Tulane paired 1,031 primary output with 86.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

2024 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 86.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2024 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 3 team stops, with role shifts visible across Oklahoma, USC, Tulane.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Memphis

Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2024 Postseason · Tulane

Games

14

Receiving Yards / G

73.6

Efficiency

86.3

Usage

29.4

Consistency

66.5

Best Game by takeover score

Memphis

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011121314

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Florida: 91. SE Louisiana: 124. Kansas State: 128. Oklahoma: 36. Louisiana: 24. South Florida: 94. UAB: 8. Rice: 25. North Texas: 26. Charlotte: 96. Temple: 94. Navy: 46. Memphis: 130. Army: 109

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Florida: 6 by 100. SE Louisiana: 4 by 100. Kansas State: 6 by 100. Oklahoma: 3 by 80. Louisiana: 5 by 32. South Florida: 4 by 100. UAB: 1 by 53.3. Rice: 3 by 55.6. North Texas: 2 by 86.7. Charlotte: 6 by 100. Temple: 4 by 100. Navy: 3 by 100. Memphis: 7 by 100. Army: 6 by 100

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins59.7 · Games = 9 · -39.1 vs Losses
Losses98.8 · Games = 5 · +39.1 vs Wins