Player Stats

Cam Jeffery College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
82
TFL
4.5
Sacks
1
QB hurries
4
Passes defended
1

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2021 Regular SeasonArkansas State23-0--038.2
2022 Regular SeasonArkansas State6240.50-1018.3
2023 Regular SeasonArkansas State834413-056.7
2024 PostseasonArkansas State111-0--09.5
2024 Regular SeasonArkansas State1120-01-09.5

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season

Arkansas State paired 8 primary output with 27.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

2024 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 8.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2024 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Southern Miss

Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2024 Postseason · Arkansas State

Games

11

Havoc Plays / G

0.1

Efficiency

8.9

Usage

1.6

Consistency

3

Best Game by takeover score

Southern Miss

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Bowling Green: 0. Central Arkansas: 0. Tulsa: 0. Iowa State: 0. South Alabama: 0. Texas State: 0. Southern Miss: 1. Troy: 0. Louisiana: 0. Georgia State: 0. Old Dominion: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Bowling Green: 1 by 4.2. Central Arkansas: 2 by 8.3. Tulsa: 1 by 4.2. Iowa State: 3 by 12.5. South Alabama: 2 by 8.3. Texas State: 8 by 33.3. Southern Miss: 0 by 10. Troy: 1 by 4.2. Louisiana: 1 by 4.2. Georgia State: 1 by 4.2. Old Dominion: 1 by 4.2

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.1 · Games = 7 · +0.1 vs Losses
Losses0 · Games = 4 · -0.1 vs Wins