Player Stats

Ethan Downs College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
106
TFL
31
Sacks
12.5
QB hurries
19
Passes defended
5

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2021 PostseasonOklahoma840.50.51-030.1
2021 Regular SeasonOklahoma8102.501-030.1
2022 Regular SeasonOklahoma123712.54.593067.9
2023 PostseasonOklahoma121-0--045.6
2023 Regular SeasonOklahoma12256.54.56-045.6
2024 PostseasonOklahoma12410--047
2024 Regular SeasonOklahoma12258322047

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season

Oklahoma paired 29 primary output with 35.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

2024 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 23.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2024 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Texas

Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 91.7th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2024 Postseason · Oklahoma

Games

12

Havoc Plays / G

1.3

Efficiency

23.4

Usage

7

Consistency

51

Best Game by takeover score

Texas

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Navy: 1. Temple: 2. Houston: 0. Tulane: 2. Tennessee: 0. Auburn: 1. Texas: 2. South Carolina: 3. Ole Miss: 1. Missouri: 1. Alabama: 2. LSU: 1

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Navy: 4 by 26.7. Temple: 2 by 28.3. Houston: 2 by 8.3. Tulane: 2 by 28.3. Tennessee: 2 by 8.3. Auburn: 2 by 18.3. Texas: 3 by 32.5. South Carolina: 2 by 38.3. Ole Miss: 1 by 14.2. Missouri: 6 by 35. Alabama: 2 by 28.3. LSU: 1 by 14.2

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins1.4 · Games = 5 · +0.1 vs Losses
Losses1.3 · Games = 7 · -0.1 vs Wins