Usage Score
25
Player Dossier
2021-2024Alabama
Ja'Corey Brooks
WR • 6'3" • 195 lbs • Miami, FL, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Ja'Corey Brooks reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
92.7
Consistency
80.7
Season Value
74.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season · Louisville
212122222324
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Alabama • Louisville
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Georgia Tech
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Ja'Corey Brooks, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season · Louisville. Ja'Corey Brooks reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season
Louisville paired 1,013 primary output with 92.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2024 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 92.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2024 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Alabama, Louisville.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Georgia Tech
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2024 Regular Season · Louisville
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
84.4
Efficiency
92.7
Usage
25
Consistency
80.7
Best Game by takeover score
Kentucky
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 83. Jacksonville State: 89. Georgia Tech: 125. Notre Dame: 71. SMU: 121. Virginia: 83. Miami: 107. Boston College: 120. Clemson: 42. Stanford: 104. Pittsburgh: 68. Kentucky: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 7 by 79. Jacksonville State: 6 by 98.9. Georgia Tech: 4 by 100. Notre Dame: 5 by 94.7. SMU: 3 by 100. Virginia: 5 by 100. Miami: 6 by 100. Boston College: 8 by 100. Clemson: 4 by 70. Stanford: 9 by 77. Pittsburgh: 4 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins75.3 · n=7 · -25.5 vs Losses
Losses100.8 · n=4 · +25.5 vs Wins
First Half95.3 · n=6 · +21.8 vs Second Half
Second Half73.5 · n=6 · -21.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Georgia Tech
Best efficiency game
100 vs Pittsburgh
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/30 | @ Kentucky | W 41-14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/23 | vs Pittsburgh | W 37-9 | — | 4 | 68 | 17 | 17 | 1 | 31 |
| Sat 11/16 | @ Stanford100 receiving yards · High volume | L 35-38 | — | 9 | 104 | 11.6 | 11.60 | 0 | 29 |
| Sat 11/2 | @ Clemson | W 33-21 | — | 4 | 42 | 10.5 | 10.50 | 0 | 22 |
| Fri 10/25 | @ Boston College100 receiving yards · High volume | W 31-27 | — | 8 | 120 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 44 |
| Sat 10/19 | vs Miami100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | L 45-52 | — | 6 | 107 | 17.8 | 17.80 | 2 | 28 |
| Sat 10/12 | @ Virginia | W 24-20 | — | 5 | 83 | 16.6 | 16.60 | 0 | 61 |
| Sat 10/5 | vs SMU100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | L 27-34 | — | 3 | 121 | 40.3 | 40.30 | 2 | 86 |
| Sat 9/28 | @ Notre Dame2+ TD | L 24-31 | — | 5 | 71 | 14.2 | 14.20 | 2 | 27 |
| Sat 9/21 | vs Georgia Tech100 receiving yards | W 31-19 | — | 4 | 125 | 31.3 | 31.30 | 1 | 57 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Jacksonville State | W 49-14 | — | 6 | 89 | 14.8 | 14.80 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 8/31 | vs Unknown | — | — | 7 | 83 | 11.9 | 11.90 | 1 | 21 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Alabama
2021-2023
Opening stop
- 2
Louisville
2024
Final stop
Season Progression
202120212022202220232024
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 Postseason | Alabama | 192 | 75.4 | 9.8 | — |
| 2021 Regular Season | Alabama | 192 | 75.4 | 9.8 | 0 |
| 2022 Postseason | Alabama | 674 | 94.6 | 15.5 | 482 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Alabama | 674 | 94.6 | 15.5 | 0 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Alabama | 30 | 44.4 | 8.6 | -644 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Louisville | 1,013 | 92.7 | 25 | 983 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Georgia Tech
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
125
Primary metric
125 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Boston College
120
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
120 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Cincinnati
66
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
66 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Vanderbilt
117
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
117 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
SMU
121
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
121 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2024 Regular Season · Louisville
1,013 primary output · 92.7 efficiency · 25 usage
74.3
#2
2022 Postseason · Alabama
60.6
674 primary · 94.6 efficiency · 15.5 usage
#3
2022 Regular Season · Alabama
60.6
674 primary · 94.6 efficiency · 15.5 usage
Milestones
6
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
4
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
5★
Class 2021 · Rating 0.9861
IMG Academy · Miami, FL
- Committed To
- Alabama
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2021
Career Facts
2
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
1,909
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 34 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.