Usage Score
34.1
Player Profile
Sieh Bangura
RB • 6'0" • 210 lbs • Bowie, MD, USA
Workhorse runnerSteady chain mover
Sieh Bangura leans workhorse runner traits and 58.8 efficiency.
Efficiency
58.8
Consistency
80.4
Season Value
68.3
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Ohio
21222223242525
Quick Facts
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Primary stop by seasons
- Ohio
- Best season by value score
- Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Ohio
- Peak game by takeover score
- Peak game by takeover score: Massachusetts
Sieh Bangura, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Ohio. Sieh Bangura leans workhorse runner traits and 58.8 efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
Ohio paired 1,469 primary output with 58.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 58.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Ohio, Minnesota.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Massachusetts
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Postseason · Ohio
Games
13
Scrimmage Yards / G
113
Efficiency
58.8
Usage
34.1
Consistency
80.4
Best Game by takeover score
UNLV
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. UNLV: 149. Rutgers: 91. West Virginia: 82. Ohio State: 24. Unknown: 128. Bowling Green: 115. Ball State: 72. Northern Illinois: 147. Eastern Michigan: 112. Miami (OH): 132. Western Michigan: 97. Massachusetts: 194. Buffalo: 126
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UNLV: 19 by 81.7. Rutgers: 17 by 55.9. West Virginia: 23 by 35.5. Ohio State: 12 by 20.8. Unknown: 19 by 70.8. Bowling Green: 18 by 66.6. Ball State: 16 by 46.7. Northern Illinois: 22 by 69.6. Eastern Michigan: 19 by 59.3. Miami (OH): 20 by 65. Western Michigan: 17 by 61.7. Massachusetts: 28 by 74.2. Buffalo: 23 by 56.9
Split Comparison
Wins132.1 · n=8 · +61.1 vs Losses
Losses71 · n=4 · -61.1 vs Wins
First Half94.4 · n=7 · -40.2 vs Second Half
Second Half134.7 · n=6 · +40.2 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Massachusetts
Best efficiency game
81.7 vs UNLV
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 12/24 | vs UNLV100 rush yards | W 17-10 | 19 | 149 | 7.80 | 1 | — | — | 7.8 |
| Fri 11/28 | @ Buffalo100 rush yards | W 31-26 | 22 | 120 | 5.50 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 5.5 |
| Wed 11/19 | vs Massachusetts100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 42-14 | 27 | 196 | 7.30 | 2 | 1 | -2 | 6.9 |
| Wed 11/12 | @ Western Michigan | L 13-17 | 16 | 97 | 6.10 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5.7 |
| Wed 11/5 | vs Miami (OH)100 rush yards | W 24-20 | 17 | 102 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 30 | 6.6 |
| Sat 10/25 | @ Eastern Michigan100 rush yards · 2+ TD | W 28-21 | 18 | 100 | 5.60 | 2 | 1 | 12 | 5.9 |
| Sat 10/18 | vs Northern Illinois100 rush yards · 2+ TD | W 48-21 | 22 | 147 | 6.70 | 3 | — | — | 6.7 |
| Sat 10/4 | @ Ball State | L 14-20 | 15 | 67 | 4.50 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 4.5 |
| Sat 9/27 | vs Bowling Green100 rush yards | W 35-20 | 18 | 115 | 6.40 | 0 | — | — | 6.4 |
| Sat 9/20 | vs Unknown100 rush yards · 2+ TD | — | 18 | 123 | 6.80 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 6.7 |
| Sat 9/13 | @ Ohio State | L 9-37 | 12 | 24 | 2 | 0 | — | — | 2 |
| Sat 9/6 | vs West Virginia | W 17-10 | 20 | 66 | 3.30 | 1 | 3 | 16 | 3.6 |
| Thu 8/28 | @ Rutgers | L 31-34 | 16 | 86 | 5.40 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 5.4 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Ohio
2021-2025
Opening stop
- 2
Minnesota
2024
Final stop
Season Progression
2021202220222023202420252025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 Regular Season | Ohio | 161 | 75 | 7.2 | — |
| 2022 Postseason | Ohio | 1,304 | 52.9 | 36.9 | 1,143 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Ohio | 1,304 | 52.9 | 36.9 | 0 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Ohio | 970 | 47.8 | 29.3 | -334 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Minnesota | 12 | 36.5 | 2.5 | -958 |
| 2025 Postseason | Ohio | 1,469 | 58.8 | 34.1 | 1,457 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Ohio | 1,469 | 58.8 | 34.1 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Massachusetts
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
194
Primary metric
194 scrimmage yards and 46.7 usage.
#2
Miami (OH)
172
Primary metric
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
172 scrimmage yards and 30.9 usage.
#3
Wyoming
156
Primary metric
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
156 scrimmage yards and 50 usage.
#4
UNLV
149
Primary metric
Win with 149 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
149 scrimmage yards and 35.2 usage.
#5
Akron
143
Primary metric
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
143 scrimmage yards and 34.8 usage.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2025 Postseason · Ohio
1,469 primary output · 58.8 efficiency · 34.1 usage
68.3
#2
2025 Regular Season · Ohio
68.3
1,469 primary · 58.8 efficiency · 34.1 usage
#3
2022 Postseason · Ohio
66.8
1,304 primary · 52.9 efficiency · 36.9 usage
Milestones
18
100+ rush yards
3
150+ scrimmage yards
10
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2026 · Rating 0.845
Strongsville · Strongsville, OH
- Committed To
- Ohio
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2026
Career Facts
2
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
3,916
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 44 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Career Metric Focus
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.