Usage Score
21.1
Player Dossier
2020-2024Ole Miss
WR • 5'11" • 190 lbs • Louisville, KY, USA
Jordan Watkins reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
21.1
Efficiency
85.5
Consistency
47.7
Season Value
63.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason · Ole Miss
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jordan Watkins, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason · Ole Miss. Jordan Watkins reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Jordan Watkins played WR for Louisville and Ole Miss. Across 5 tracked seasons, Jordan Watkins recorded 19 passing yards, 31 rushing yards, and 2,682 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2024 with Ole Miss.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason
Ole Miss paired 741 primary output with 81.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2024 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 85.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2024 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Louisville, Ole Miss.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Arkansas
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
75.5
Efficiency
85.5
Usage
21.1
Consistency
47.7
Best Game by takeover score
Duke
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Duke: 180. Middle Tennessee: 28. Wake Forest: 75. Georgia Southern: 36. Kentucky: 0. South Carolina: 72. LSU: 25. Oklahoma: 59. Arkansas: 254. Georgia: 68. Florida: 70. Mississippi State: 39
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Duke: 7 by 100. Middle Tennessee: 1 by 100. Wake Forest: 1 by 100. Georgia Southern: 3 by 80. South Carolina: 5 by 96. LSU: 3 by 55.6. Oklahoma: 4 by 98.3. Arkansas: 8 by 100. Georgia: 4 by 100. Florida: 8 by 58.3. Mississippi State: 5 by 52
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Arkansas
Best efficiency game
100 vs Duke
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 1/3 | vs Duke100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 52-20 | — | 7 | 180 | 25.7 | 25.70 | 2 | 69 |
| Fri 11/29 | vs Mississippi State | W 26-14 | — | 5 | 39 | 7.8 | 7.80 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 11/23 | @ FloridaHigh volume | L 17-24 | — | 8 | 70 | 8.8 | 8.80 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 11/9 | vs Georgia | W 28-10 | — | 4 | 68 | 12.6 | 17 | 0 | 33 |
| Sat 11/2 | @ Arkansas100 receiving yards · High volume | W 63-31 | — | 8 | 254 | 31.8 | 31.80 | 5 | 66 |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Oklahoma | W 26-14 | — | 4 | 59 | 14.8 | 14.80 | 0 | 34 |
| Sat 10/12 | @ LSU | L 26-29 | — | 3 | 25 | 8.3 | 8.30 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 10/5 | @ South Carolina | W 27-3 | — | 5 | 72 | 14.4 | 14.40 | 0 | 41 |
| Sat 9/28 | vs Kentucky | L 17-20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/21 | vs Georgia Southern | W 52-13 | — | 3 | 36 | 12 | 12 | 1 | 23 |
| Sat 9/14 | @ Wake Forest | W 40-6 | — | 1 | 75 | 75 | 75 | 1 | 75 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Middle Tennessee | W 52-3 | — | 1 | 28 | 28 | 28 | 0 | 28 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Louisville
2020-2021
Opening stop
Ole Miss
2022-2024
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 Regular Season | Louisville | 57 | 40 | 10 | — |
| 2021 Regular Season | Louisville | 529 | 84.1 | 17.3 | 472 |
| 2022 Postseason | Ole Miss | 449 | 68.4 | 21.4 | -80 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Ole Miss | 449 | 68.4 | 21.4 | 0 |
| 2023 Postseason | Ole Miss | 741 | 81.1 | 24.8 | 292 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Ole Miss | 741 | 81.1 | 24.8 | 0 |
| 2024 Postseason | Ole Miss | 906 | 85.5 | 21.1 | 165 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Ole Miss | 906 | 85.5 | 21.1 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Georgia Tech
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
119
Primary metric
119 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Arkansas
254
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
254 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Vanderbilt
117
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
117 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
NC State
83
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
83 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Unknown
111
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
111 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2023 Postseason · Ole Miss
741 primary output · 81.1 efficiency · 24.8 usage
67.1
#2
2023 Regular Season · Ole Miss
67.1
741 primary · 81.1 efficiency · 24.8 usage
#3
2024 Postseason · Ole Miss
63.6
906 primary · 85.5 efficiency · 21.1 usage
6
100+ receiving yards
4
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2026 · Rating 0.9254
Portage Northern · Portage, MI
Career Facts
2
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
2,682
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 54 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.