Player Stats

Tyler Warren College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
1,839
Receptions
153
Touchdowns
26

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2020 Regular SeasonPenn State0-00-
2021 PostseasonPenn State810022.1
2021 Regular SeasonPenn State8461322.1
2022 PostseasonPenn State7115042.9
2022 Regular SeasonPenn State79108342.9
2023 PostseasonPenn State135127049.1
2023 Regular SeasonPenn State1329295749.1
2024 PostseasonPenn State1616171283
2024 Regular SeasonPenn State16881,0621183

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason

Penn State paired 1,233 primary output with 73.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

2024 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 73.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2024 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: USC

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2024 Postseason · Penn State

Games

16

Receiving Yards / G

77.1

Efficiency

73.5

Usage

35.6

Consistency

58.6

Best Game by takeover score

USC

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213141516

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Notre Dame: 75. Boise State: 63. SMU: 33. West Virginia: 30. Bowling Green: 146. Kent State: 50. Illinois: 34. UCLA: 29. USC: 224. Wisconsin: 46. Ohio State: 47. Washington: 75. Purdue: 127. Minnesota: 102. Maryland: 68. Oregon: 84

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Notre Dame: 6 by 83.3. Boise State: 6 by 70. SMU: 4 by 55. West Virginia: 3 by 66.7. Bowling Green: 8 by 100. Kent State: 5 by 66.7. Illinois: 4 by 56.7. UCLA: 3 by 64.4. USC: 17 by 87.8. Wisconsin: 7 by 43.8. Ohio State: 4 by 78.3. Washington: 8 by 62.5. Purdue: 8 by 100. Minnesota: 8 by 85. Maryland: 6 by 75.6. Oregon: 7 by 80

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins79 · Games = 13 · +10.3 vs Losses
Losses68.7 · Games = 3 · -10.3 vs Wins