Usage Score
41.2
Player Dossier
2020-2022Kansas State
Deuce Vaughn
RB • 5'6" • 176 lbs • Round Rock, TX, USA
Workhorse runnerSteady chain mover
Deuce Vaughn leans workhorse runner traits and 56.8 efficiency.
Efficiency
56.8
Consistency
84.2
Season Value
70.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason · Kansas State
2021212222
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Kansas State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Kansas
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Deuce Vaughn, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason · Kansas State. Deuce Vaughn leans workhorse runner traits and 56.8 efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason
Kansas State paired 1,872 primary output with 62.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 56.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2022 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Kansas
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2022 Postseason · Kansas State
Games
14
Scrimmage Yards / G
138.3
Efficiency
56.8
Usage
41.2
Consistency
84.2
Best Game by takeover score
Alabama
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011121314
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Alabama: 133. Unknown: 128. Missouri: 149. Tulane: 111. Oklahoma: 129. Texas Tech: 181. Iowa State: 37. TCU: 121. Oklahoma State: 176. Texas: 159. Baylor: 156. West Virginia: 67. Kansas: 229. TCU: 160
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Alabama: 22 by 63. Unknown: 19 by 71.8. Missouri: 25 by 62.6. Tulane: 28 by 41.8. Oklahoma: 27 by 48.9. Texas Tech: 24 by 77.6. Iowa State: 12 by 27.2. TCU: 16 by 74.7. Oklahoma State: 26 by 73.1. Texas: 26 by 49.5. Baylor: 33 by 46.2. West Virginia: 22 by 31.7. Kansas: 27 by 72.1. TCU: 28 by 55.1
Split Comparison
Wins142.7 · n=9 · +11.7 vs Losses
Losses131 · n=4 · -11.7 vs Wins
First Half124 · n=7 · -28.6 vs Second Half
Second Half152.6 · n=7 · +28.6 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Kansas
Best efficiency game
77.6 vs Texas Tech
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/31 | vs Alabama100 rush yards | L 20-45 | 22 | 133 | 6 | 1 | — | — | 6.0 |
| Sat 12/3 | @ TCU100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 31-28 | 26 | 130 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 30 | 5.7 |
| Sun 11/27 | vs Kansas100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 47-27 | 25 | 147 | 5.90 | 1 | 2 | 82 | 8.5 |
| Sat 11/19 | @ West Virginia | W 48-31 | 22 | 67 | 3 | 1 | — | — | 3.0 |
| Sun 11/13 | @ Baylor100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 31-3 | 25 | 106 | 4.20 | 0 | 8 | 50 | 4.7 |
| Sat 11/5 | vs Texas150 scrimmage yards | L 27-34 | 19 | 73 | 3.80 | 0 | 7 | 86 | 6.1 |
| Sat 10/29 | vs Oklahoma State100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 48-0 | 22 | 158 | 7.20 | 1 | 4 | 18 | 6.8 |
| Sun 10/23 | @ TCU | L 28-38 | 12 | 83 | 6.90 | 1 | 4 | 38 | 7.6 |
| Sat 10/8 | @ Iowa State | W 10-9 | 10 | 23 | 2.30 | 0 | 2 | 14 | 3.1 |
| Sat 10/1 | vs Texas Tech100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 37-28 | 23 | 170 | 7.40 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 7.5 |
| Sun 9/25 | @ Oklahoma100 rush yards | W 41-34 | 25 | 116 | 4.60 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 4.8 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Tulane | L 10-17 | 20 | 81 | 4.10 | 0 | 8 | 30 | 4.0 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Missouri100 rush yards · 2+ TD | W 40-12 | 24 | 145 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 6.0 |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Unknown100 rush yards | — | 18 | 126 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6.7 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Kansas State
2020-2022
Opening stop
Season Progression
20202021202120222022
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 Regular Season | Kansas State | 1,086 | 61.2 | 30.4 | — |
| 2021 Postseason | Kansas State | 1,872 | 62.7 | 44.4 | 786 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Kansas State | 1,872 | 62.7 | 44.4 | 0 |
| 2022 Postseason | Kansas State | 1,936 | 56.8 | 41.2 | 64 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Kansas State | 1,936 | 56.8 | 41.2 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Kansas
Win with 232 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
232
Primary metric
232 scrimmage yards and 33.3 usage.
#2
Kansas
229
Primary metric
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
229 scrimmage yards and 50.9 usage.
#3
Texas Tech
194
Primary metric
Win with 194 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
194 scrimmage yards and 35.2 usage.
#4
Texas
170
Primary metric
Loss with 170 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
170 scrimmage yards and 22.6 usage.
#5
Baylor
165
Primary metric
Loss with 165 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
165 scrimmage yards and 44.4 usage.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2021 Postseason · Kansas State
1,872 primary output · 62.7 efficiency · 44.4 usage
74.3
#2
2021 Regular Season · Kansas State
74.3
1,872 primary · 62.7 efficiency · 44.4 usage
#3
2022 Postseason · Kansas State
70.5
1,936 primary · 56.8 efficiency · 41.2 usage
Milestones
29
100+ rush yards
15
150+ scrimmage yards
10
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2020 · Rating 0.85
Cedar Ridge · Round Rock, TX
- Committed To
- Kansas State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2020
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
4,894
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 37 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.