Player Stats

Tim Keenan III College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
95
TFL
12.5
Sacks
5.5
QB hurries
10
Passes defended
3

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2022 Regular SeasonAlabama110.50--032.8
2023 PostseasonAlabama122-0--045.6
2023 Regular SeasonAlabama12361.5171045.6
2024 PostseasonAlabama12410--054.3
2024 Regular SeasonAlabama12366.52.521054.3
2025 PostseasonAlabama93-01-029.6
2025 Regular SeasonAlabama91332-1029.6

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason

Alabama paired 13 primary output with 24.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

2025 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 15.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Eastern Illinois

Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2025 Postseason · Alabama

Games

9

Havoc Plays / G

0.8

Efficiency

15.2

Usage

4.1

Consistency

14.8

Best Game by takeover score

Eastern Illinois

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Indiana: 0. Oklahoma: 1. Vanderbilt: 0. Tennessee: 0. South Carolina: 0. LSU: 0. Oklahoma: 1. Eastern Illinois: 4. Georgia: 1

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Indiana: 2 by 8.3. Oklahoma: 1 by 14.2. Tennessee: 2 by 8.3. South Carolina: 4 by 16.7. LSU: 1 by 4.2. Oklahoma: 0 by 10. Eastern Illinois: 2 by 48.3. Georgia: 4 by 26.7

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.8 · Games = 6 · +0.2 vs Losses
Losses0.7 · Games = 3 · -0.2 vs Wins