Usage Score
3.9
Player Dossier
2022-2025Alabama
Tim Keenan III
DL • 6'2" • 320 lbs • Birmingham, AL, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Tim Keenan III shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 14.1 disruption score.
Efficiency
14.1
Consistency
11.1
Season Value
11.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · Alabama
22232324242525
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Alabama
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: South Florida
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Tim Keenan III, DL. Best season Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · Alabama. Tim Keenan III shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 14.1 disruption score.
Tim Keenan III played DL for Alabama. Across 4 tracked seasons, Tim Keenan III recorded 95 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2024 with Alabama.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season
Alabama paired 0.5 primary output with 9.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 14.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Game with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Postseason · Alabama
Games
9
Havoc Plays / G
0.7
Efficiency
14.1
Usage
3.9
Consistency
11.1
Best Game by takeover score
Indiana
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Indiana: 0. Oklahoma: 0. Vanderbilt: 0. Tennessee: 0. South Carolina: 0. LSU: 0. Oklahoma: 1. Unknown: 4. Georgia: 1
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Indiana: 2 by 8.3. Oklahoma: 1 by 4.2. Tennessee: 2 by 8.3. South Carolina: 4 by 16.7. LSU: 1 by 4.2. Oklahoma: 0 by 10. Unknown: 2 by 48.3. Georgia: 4 by 26.7
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins0 · Games = 5 · -0.7 vs Losses
Losses0.7 · Games = 3 · +0.7 vs Wins
First Half0 · Games = 5 · -1.5 vs Second Half
Second Half1.5 · Games = 4 · +1.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Unknown
Best efficiency game
48.3 vs Unknown
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 1/1 | @ Indiana | L 3-38 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 12/20 | @ Oklahoma | W 34-24 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 12/6 | vs Georgia | L 7-28 | 4 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/22 | vs Unknown2+ sacks · Splash game | — | 2 | 2 | — | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/15 | vs Oklahoma | L 21-23 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 11/9 | vs LSU | W 20-9 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/25 | @ South Carolina | W 29-22 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/18 | vs Tennessee | W 37-20 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/4 | vs Vanderbilt | W 30-14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Alabama
2022-2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
2022202320232024202420252025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Regular Season | Alabama | 0.5 | 9.2 | 2.7 | — |
| 2023 Postseason | Alabama | 3.5 | 16.1 | 3.4 | 3 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Alabama | 3.5 | 16.1 | 3.4 | 0 |
| 2024 Postseason | Alabama | 11 | 23.1 | 7.8 | 7.5 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Alabama | 11 | 23.1 | 7.8 | 0 |
| 2025 Postseason | Alabama | 6 | 14.1 | 3.9 | -5 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Alabama | 6 | 14.1 | 3.9 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
South Florida
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4
Primary metric
4 disruption/tackle impact with 67.1 takeover score.
#2
Texas A&M
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 56.2 takeover score.
#3
Unknown
4
Primary metric
Game with backfield disruption leading the way.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 55.6 takeover score.
#4
Auburn
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 33.9 takeover score.
#5
Kentucky
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 23.4 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2022 Regular Season · Alabama
0.5 primary output · 9.2 efficiency · 2.7 usage
28.3
#2
2024 Postseason · Alabama
26.1
11 primary · 23.1 efficiency · 7.8 usage
#3
2024 Regular Season · Alabama
26.1
11 primary · 23.1 efficiency · 7.8 usage
Milestones
1
Impact games
2
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2021 · Rating 0.8933
Ramsay · Birmingham, AL
- Committed To
- Alabama
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2021
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
95
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 34 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.