Usage Score
7.9
Player Dossier
2020-2024East Carolina
Tyler Savage
TE • 6'4" • 239 lbs • Aldie, VA, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Tyler Savage reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
84.3
Consistency
52.2
Season Value
60.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season · East Carolina
202122222324
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- East Carolina
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Liberty
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Tyler Savage, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season · East Carolina. Tyler Savage reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Tyler Savage played TE for East Carolina. Across 5 tracked seasons, Tyler Savage recorded 264 receiving yards and 1 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2024 with East Carolina.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season
East Carolina paired 193 primary output with 84.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2024 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 84.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2024 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Liberty
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2024 Regular Season · East Carolina
Games
9
Receiving Yards / G
21.4
Efficiency
84.3
Usage
7.9
Consistency
52.2
Best Game by takeover score
Navy
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 25. Old Dominion: 9. Liberty: 45. UTSA: 12. Charlotte: 39. Army: 15. Florida Atlantic: 25. Tulsa: 9. Navy: 14
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 1 by 100. Old Dominion: 1 by 60. Liberty: 3 by 100. UTSA: 1 by 80. Charlotte: 4 by 65. Army: 1 by 100. Florida Atlantic: 1 by 100. Tulsa: 1 by 60. Navy: 1 by 93.3
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins13.8 · Games = 4 · -14.5 vs Losses
Losses28.3 · Games = 4 · +14.5 vs Wins
First Half26 · Games = 5 · +10.3 vs Second Half
Second Half15.8 · Games = 4 · -10.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Liberty
Best efficiency game
100 vs Florida Atlantic
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/29 | vs Navy | L 20-34 | — | 1 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 14 |
| Fri 11/15 | @ Tulsa | W 38-31 | — | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Fri 11/8 | vs Florida Atlantic | W 49-14 | — | 1 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 10/19 | @ Army | L 28-45 | — | 1 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 10/5 | @ Charlotte | L 24-55 | — | 4 | 39 | 9.8 | 9.80 | 1 | 15 |
| Sat 9/28 | vs UTSA | W 30-20 | — | 1 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 9/21 | @ Liberty | L 24-35 | — | 3 | 45 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 34 |
| Sat 9/7 | @ Old Dominion | W 20-14 | — | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 8/31 | vs Unknown | — | — | 1 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 0 | 25 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
East Carolina
2020-2024
Opening stop
Season Progression
202020212022202220232024
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 Regular Season | East Carolina | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2021 Regular Season | East Carolina | 13 | 86.7 | 4.8 | 13 |
| 2022 Postseason | East Carolina | 27 | 60 | 3.5 | 14 |
| 2022 Regular Season | East Carolina | 27 | 60 | 3.5 | 0 |
| 2023 Regular Season | East Carolina | 31 | 31.7 | 7.3 | 4 |
| 2024 Regular Season | East Carolina | 193 | 84.3 | 7.9 | 162 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Liberty
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
45
Primary metric
45 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
UCF
24
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
24 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
South Florida
13
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
13 receiving yards with a 86.7 efficiency score.
#4
Charlotte
39
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
39 receiving yards with a 65 efficiency score.
#5
Florida Atlantic
25
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
25 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2024 Regular Season · East Carolina
193 primary output · 84.3 efficiency · 7.9 usage
60.8
#2
2021 Regular Season · East Carolina
49.5
13 primary · 86.7 efficiency · 4.8 usage
#3
2022 Postseason · East Carolina
33.7
27 primary · 60 efficiency · 3.5 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2020 · Rating 0.8033
John Champe · Aldie, VA
- Committed To
- East Carolina
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2020
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
264
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 16 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.