Usage Score
4.9
Player Dossier
2020-2024Auburn
Cam Riley
LB • 6'5" • 237 lbs • Evergreen, AL, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Cam Riley shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 19.5 disruption score.
Efficiency
15.3
Consistency
12.8
Season Value
10.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason · Auburn
2020212122232324
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- Auburn • Florida State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Western Kentucky
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Cam Riley, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason · Auburn. Cam Riley shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 19.5 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason
Auburn paired 0 primary output with 9.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2023 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 15.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2024 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Auburn, Florida State.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Texas A&M
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2023 Postseason · Auburn
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
0.5
Efficiency
15.3
Usage
4.9
Consistency
12.8
Best Game by takeover score
Maryland
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Maryland: 0. Massachusetts: 0. California: 0. Unknown: 2. Texas A&M: 2. Georgia: 0. LSU: 0. Ole Miss: 1. Mississippi State: 1. Vanderbilt: 1. Arkansas: 0. New Mexico State: 0. Alabama: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Maryland: 3 by 12.5. Massachusetts: 1 by 4.2. California: 2 by 8.3. Unknown: 2 by 28.3. Texas A&M: 2 by 28.3. Georgia: 4 by 16.7. LSU: 1 by 4.2. Ole Miss: 6 by 35. Mississippi State: 4 by 26.7. Vanderbilt: 1 by 14.2. Arkansas: 2 by 8.3. New Mexico State: 1 by 4.2. Alabama: 2 by 8.3
Split Comparison
Wins0.4 · n=5 · -0.0 vs Losses
Losses0.4 · n=7 · +0.0 vs Wins
First Half0.6 · n=7 · +0.1 vs Second Half
Second Half0.5 · n=6 · -0.1 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Texas A&M
Best efficiency game
35 vs Ole Miss
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/30 | @ Maryland | L 13-31 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/25 | vs Alabama | L 24-27 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/18 | vs New Mexico State | L 10-31 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/11 | @ Arkansas | W 48-10 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/4 | @ Vanderbilt | W 31-15 | 1 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/28 | vs Mississippi State | W 27-13 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/21 | vs Ole Miss | L 21-28 | 6 | 5 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/14 | @ LSU | L 18-48 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/30 | vs Georgia | L 20-27 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/23 | @ Texas A&M | L 10-27 | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/16 | vs Unknown | — | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/10 | @ California | W 14-10 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/2 | vs Massachusetts | W 59-14 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Auburn
2020-2023
Opening stop
- 2
Florida State
2024
Final stop
Season Progression
20202020202120212022202320232024
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 Postseason | Auburn | 0 | 9.4 | 1.5 | — |
| 2020 Regular Season | Auburn | 0 | 9.4 | 1.5 | 0 |
| 2021 Postseason | Auburn | 1 | 11.4 | 2.5 | 1 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Auburn | 1 | 11.4 | 2.5 | 0 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Auburn | 4.5 | 29.9 | 8 | 3.5 |
| 2023 Postseason | Auburn | 7 | 15.3 | 4.9 | 2.5 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Auburn | 7 | 15.3 | 4.9 | 0 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Florida State | 6 | 19.5 | 5.4 | -1 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Western Kentucky
Win with 1.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1.5
Primary metric
1.5 disruption/tackle impact with 52.8 takeover score.
#2
Clemson
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 50.4 takeover score.
#3
Texas A&M
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 48.9 takeover score.
#4
Unknown
2
Primary metric
Game with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 47 takeover score.
#5
Unknown
1
Primary metric
Game with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 39.6 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2020 Postseason · Auburn
0 primary output · 9.4 efficiency · 1.5 usage
37
#2
2020 Regular Season · Auburn
37
0 primary · 9.4 efficiency · 1.5 usage
#3
2024 Regular Season · Florida State
20.7
6 primary · 19.5 efficiency · 5.4 usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
0
Splash games
2
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2020 · Rating 0.8976
Hillcrest · Evergreen, AL
- Committed To
- Auburn
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2020
Career Facts
2
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
155
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 44 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.