Player Stats

Tyreem Powell College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
194
TFL
13
Sacks
7
QB hurries
10
Passes defended
8

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2020 Regular SeasonRutgers00-0--0-
2021 PostseasonRutgers82-0--09.8
2021 Regular SeasonRutgers816-0--09.8
2022 Regular SeasonRutgers12686.5454070.5
2023 Regular SeasonRutgers8523322052.7
2024 PostseasonRutgers108-0--049.4
2024 Regular SeasonRutgers10483.5032049.4

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season

Rutgers paired 19.5 primary output with 39.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

2024 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 31.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2024 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Nebraska

Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2024 Postseason · Rutgers

Games

10

Havoc Plays / G

0.8

Efficiency

31.8

Usage

7.6

Consistency

58.9

Best Game by takeover score

Nebraska

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Kansas State: 0. Virginia Tech: 1. Washington: 2. Nebraska: 2. UCLA: 1. USC: 0. Minnesota: 1. Maryland: 0. Illinois: 1. Michigan State: 0.5

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Kansas State: 8 by 33.3. Virginia Tech: 3 by 22.5. Washington: 5 by 40.8. Nebraska: 5 by 40.8. UCLA: 5 by 30.8. USC: 6 by 25. Minnesota: 8 by 43.3. Maryland: 6 by 25. Illinois: 6 by 35. Michigan State: 4 by 21.7

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.9 · Games = 5 · +0.1 vs Losses
Losses0.8 · Games = 5 · -0.1 vs Wins