Player Stats

Rome Odunze College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
3,272
Receptions
214
Touchdowns
28

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2020 Regular SeasonWashington2672045.1
2021 Regular SeasonWashington941415459.4
2022 PostseasonWashington12557073.7
2022 Regular SeasonWashington12701,088873.7
2023 PostseasonWashington1511212091.6
2023 Regular SeasonWashington15811,4281691.6

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason

Washington paired 1,640 primary output with 97.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

2023 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 97.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Michigan State

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2023 Postseason · Washington

Games

15

Receiving Yards / G

109.3

Efficiency

97.9

Usage

25.9

Consistency

82.1

Best Game by takeover score

Michigan State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112131415

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Michigan: 87. Texas: 125. Boise State: 132. Tulsa: 107. Michigan State: 180. California: 125. Arizona: 64. Oregon: 128. Arizona State: 82. Stanford: 89. USC: 82. Utah: 111. Oregon State: 106. Washington State: 120. Oregon: 102

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Michigan: 5 by 100. Texas: 6 by 100. Boise State: 7 by 100. Tulsa: 7 by 100. Michigan State: 8 by 100. California: 5 by 100. Arizona: 5 by 85.3. Oregon: 8 by 100. Arizona State: 5 by 100. Stanford: 6 by 98.9. USC: 5 by 100. Utah: 3 by 100. Oregon State: 7 by 100. Washington State: 7 by 100. Oregon: 8 by 85

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins110.9 · Games = 14 · +23.9 vs Losses
Losses87 · Games = 1 · -23.9 vs Wins