Usage Score
20.3
Player Dossier
2021-2025Oklahoma
Jalil Farooq
WR • 6'2" • 213 lbs • Lanham, MD, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Jalil Farooq reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
61
Consistency
65.6
Season Value
55.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason · Oklahoma
2121222223232425
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- Oklahoma • Maryland
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Iowa State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jalil Farooq, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason · Oklahoma. Jalil Farooq reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason
Oklahoma paired 694 primary output with 81.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 61 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2025 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Oklahoma, Maryland.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Michigan State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Regular Season · Maryland
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
45.4
Efficiency
61
Usage
20.3
Consistency
65.6
Best Game by takeover score
Michigan State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Florida Atlantic: 43. Northern Illinois: 55. Unknown: 53. Wisconsin: 31. Washington: 51. Nebraska: 15. UCLA: 29. Indiana: 43. Rutgers: 9. Illinois: 35. Michigan: 71. Michigan State: 110
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Florida Atlantic: 4 by 71.7. Northern Illinois: 5 by 73.3. Unknown: 5 by 70.7. Wisconsin: 3 by 68.9. Washington: 8 by 42.5. Nebraska: 2 by 50. UCLA: 4 by 48.3. Indiana: 4 by 71.7. Rutgers: 3 by 20. Illinois: 5 by 46.7. Michigan: 5 by 94.7. Michigan State: 10 by 73.3
Split Comparison
Wins43 · n=3 · -2.4 vs Losses
Losses45.4 · n=8 · +2.4 vs Wins
First Half41.3 · n=6 · -8.2 vs Second Half
Second Half49.5 · n=6 · +8.2 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Michigan State
Best efficiency game
94.7 vs Michigan
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 11/30 | @ Michigan State100 receiving yards · High volume | L 28-38 | — | 10 | 110 | 11 | 11 | 2 | 24 |
| Sat 11/22 | vs Michigan | L 20-45 | — | 5 | 71 | 14.2 | 14.20 | 1 | 29 |
| Sat 11/15 | @ Illinois | L 6-24 | — | 5 | 35 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 11/8 | @ Rutgers | L 20-35 | — | 3 | 9 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 11/1 | vs Indiana | L 10-55 | — | 4 | 43 | 10.8 | 10.80 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 10/18 | @ UCLA | L 17-20 | — | 4 | 29 | 7.3 | 7.30 | 1 | 10 |
| Sat 10/11 | vs Nebraska | L 31-34 | — | 2 | 15 | 5.7 | 7.50 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 10/4 | vs WashingtonHigh volume | L 20-24 | — | 8 | 51 | 6.3 | 6.40 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 9/20 | @ Wisconsin | W 27-10 | — | 3 | 31 | 10.3 | 10.30 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 9/13 | vs Unknown | — | — | 5 | 53 | 10.6 | 10.60 | 0 | 18 |
| Fri 9/5 | vs Northern Illinois | W 20-9 | — | 5 | 55 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 8/30 | vs Florida Atlantic | W 39-7 | — | 4 | 43 | 10.8 | 10.80 | 0 | 24 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Oklahoma
2021-2024
Opening stop
- 2
Maryland
2025
Final stop
Season Progression
20212021202220222023202320242025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 Postseason | Oklahoma | 69 | 66.7 | 10.5 | — |
| 2021 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 69 | 66.7 | 10.5 | 0 |
| 2022 Postseason | Oklahoma | 466 | 71.9 | 16.4 | 397 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 466 | 71.9 | 16.4 | 0 |
| 2023 Postseason | Oklahoma | 694 | 81.8 | 16.3 | 228 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 694 | 81.8 | 16.3 | 0 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 58 | 68.4 | 8.6 | -636 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Maryland | 545 | 61 | 20.3 | 487 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Iowa State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
74
Primary metric
74 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Texas
130
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
130 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Tulsa
126
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
126 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Oregon
64
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
64 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Florida State
59
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
59 receiving yards with a 98.3 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2023 Postseason · Oklahoma
694 primary output · 81.8 efficiency · 16.3 usage
61.4
#2
2023 Regular Season · Oklahoma
61.4
694 primary · 81.8 efficiency · 16.3 usage
#3
2025 Regular Season · Maryland
55.2
545 primary · 61 efficiency · 20.3 usage
Milestones
3
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2021 · Rating 0.9441
Dr. Henry Wise · Upper Marlboro, MD
- Committed To
- Oklahoma
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2021
Career Facts
2
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
1,832
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 41 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.