Player Stats

Junior Colson College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
229
TFL
8.5
Sacks
2.5
QB hurries
6
Passes defended
4

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2021 PostseasonMichigan144-0--034.1
2021 Regular SeasonMichigan14560.50.532034.1
2022 Regular SeasonMichigan1280621-068.2
2023 PostseasonMichigan1410-0--041.7
2023 Regular SeasonMichigan14792022041.7

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season

Michigan paired 9 primary output with 34.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

2023 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 30.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: East Carolina

Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2023 Postseason · Michigan

Games

14

Havoc Plays / G

0.4

Efficiency

30.8

Usage

7.2

Consistency

9.5

Best Game by takeover score

East Carolina

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011121314

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Alabama: 0. East Carolina: 2. UNLV: 0. Bowling Green: 0. Rutgers: 0. Nebraska: 0. Minnesota: 1. Indiana: 0. Michigan State: 0. Purdue: 1. Penn State: 0. Maryland: 0. Ohio State: 0. Iowa: 2

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Alabama: 10 by 41.7. East Carolina: 5 by 40.8. UNLV: 4 by 16.7. Bowling Green: 7 by 29.2. Rutgers: 6 by 25. Nebraska: 3 by 12.5. Minnesota: 3 by 22.5. Indiana: 6 by 25. Michigan State: 11 by 45.8. Purdue: 4 by 26.7. Penn State: 3 by 12.5. Maryland: 8 by 33.3. Ohio State: 11 by 45.8. Iowa: 8 by 53.3

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

First Half0.4 · Games = 7 · +0 vs Second Half
Second Half0.4 · Games = 7 · +0 vs First Half