Usage Score
16.1
Player Dossier
2021-2024Clemson
Beaux Collins
WR • 6'3" • 202 lbs • Los Angeles, CA, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Beaux Collins reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
74
Consistency
63.4
Season Value
62.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · Clemson
212122232424
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Clemson • Notre Dame
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Wake Forest
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Beaux Collins, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · Clemson. Beaux Collins reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season
Clemson paired 373 primary output with 93.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2024 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 74 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2024 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Clemson, Notre Dame.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Stanford
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2024 Postseason · Notre Dame
Games
14
Receiving Yards / G
35
Efficiency
74
Usage
16.1
Consistency
63.4
Best Game by takeover score
Ohio State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011121314
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Ohio State: 32. Georgia: 13. Indiana: 18. Texas A&M: 62. Northern Illinois: 45. Purdue: 9. Miami (OH): 60. Louisville: 5. Stanford: 85. Georgia Tech: 51. Navy: 42. Florida State: 15. Virginia: 16. Army: 37
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Ohio State: 4 by 53.3. Georgia: 1 by 86.7. Indiana: 2 by 60. Texas A&M: 5 by 82.7. Northern Illinois: 5 by 60. Purdue: 2 by 30. Miami (OH): 4 by 100. Louisville: 1 by 33.3. Stanford: 4 by 100. Georgia Tech: 5 by 68. Navy: 2 by 100. Florida State: 1 by 100. Virginia: 1 by 100. Army: 4 by 61.7
Split Comparison
Wins34.4 · n=12 · -4.1 vs Losses
Losses38.5 · n=2 · +4.1 vs Wins
First Half34.1 · n=7 · -1.7 vs Second Half
Second Half35.9 · n=7 · +1.7 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Stanford
Best efficiency game
100 vs Virginia
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 1/21 | vs Ohio State | L 23-34 | — | 4 | 32 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 12 |
| Thu 1/2 | @ Georgia | W 23-10 | — | 1 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 1 | 13 |
| Sat 12/21 | vs Indiana | W 27-17 | — | 2 | 18 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 10 |
| Sun 11/24 | vs Army | W 49-14 | — | 4 | 37 | 9.3 | 9.30 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 11/16 | vs Virginia | W 35-14 | — | 1 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 16 |
| Sun 11/10 | vs Florida State | W 52-3 | — | 1 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 10/26 | @ Navy | W 51-14 | — | 2 | 42 | 21 | 21 | 1 | 37 |
| Sat 10/19 | @ Georgia Tech | W 31-13 | — | 5 | 51 | 10.2 | 10.20 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 10/12 | vs Stanford | W 49-7 | — | 4 | 85 | 21.3 | 21.30 | 0 | 53 |
| Sat 9/28 | vs Louisville | W 31-24 | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 9/21 | vs Miami (OH) | W 28-3 | — | 4 | 60 | 15 | 15 | 1 | 38 |
| Sat 9/14 | @ Purdue | W 66-7 | — | 2 | 9 | 4.5 | 4.50 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Northern Illinois | L 14-16 | — | 5 | 45 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 8/31 | @ Texas A&M | W 23-13 | — | 5 | 62 | 12.4 | 12.40 | 0 | 20 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Clemson
2021-2023
Opening stop
- 2
Notre Dame
2024
Final stop
Season Progression
202120212022202320242024
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 Postseason | Clemson | 407 | 66.1 | 20.3 | — |
| 2021 Regular Season | Clemson | 407 | 66.1 | 20.3 | 0 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Clemson | 373 | 93.1 | 14.5 | -34 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Clemson | 510 | 78.1 | 16.3 | 137 |
| 2024 Postseason | Notre Dame | 490 | 74 | 16.1 | -20 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 490 | 74 | 16.1 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Wake Forest
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
137
Primary metric
137 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
South Carolina
65
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
65 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Stanford
85
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
85 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Unknown
137
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
137 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Louisville
104
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
104 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2022 Regular Season · Clemson
373 primary output · 93.1 efficiency · 14.5 usage
64.7
#2
2023 Regular Season · Clemson
62.9
510 primary · 78.1 efficiency · 16.3 usage
#3
2024 Postseason · Notre Dame
62.2
490 primary · 74 efficiency · 16.1 usage
Milestones
3
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2021 · Rating 0.9624
St. John Bosco · Bellflower, CA
- Committed To
- Clemson
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2021
Career Facts
2
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
1,780
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 41 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.