Player Stats

Romello Brinson College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
1,399
Receptions
99
Touchdowns
6

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2021 Regular SeasonMiami4790150.2
2022 Regular SeasonMiami8799028.1
2023 PostseasonSMU12214059.6
2023 Regular SeasonSMU1226417259.6
2024 PostseasonSMU61-2036.5
2024 Regular SeasonSMU613143036.5
2025 Regular SeasonSMU1043638377

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season

SMU paired 638 primary output with 79.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

2025 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 79.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2025 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Miami, SMU.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: East Texas A&M

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 90th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2025 Regular Season · SMU

Games

10

Receiving Yards / G

63.8

Efficiency

79.5

Usage

18.4

Consistency

67.1

Best Game by takeover score

East Texas A&M

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. East Texas A&M: 121. Baylor: 126. Missouri State: 67. TCU: 51. Syracuse: 71. Stanford: 48. Clemson: 18. Wake Forest: 13. Miami: 67. Louisville: 56

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. East Texas A&M: 7 by 100. Baylor: 4 by 100. Missouri State: 4 by 100. TCU: 4 by 85. Syracuse: 7 by 67.6. Stanford: 6 by 53.3. Clemson: 2 by 60. Wake Forest: 3 by 28.9. Miami: 3 by 100. Louisville: 3 by 100

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins64 · Games = 7 · +0.7 vs Losses
Losses63.3 · Games = 3 · -0.7 vs Wins