Usage Score
15.5
Player Dossier
2021-2024Clemson
Jake Briningstool
TE • 6'6" • 240 lbs • Brentwood, TN, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Jake Briningstool reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
66.2
Consistency
48.2
Season Value
57.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason · Clemson
21222223232424
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Clemson
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Miami
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jake Briningstool, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason · Clemson. Jake Briningstool reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason
Clemson paired 530 primary output with 66.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2024 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 66.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2024 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Wake Forest
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2024 Postseason · Clemson
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
40.8
Efficiency
66.2
Usage
15.5
Consistency
48.2
Best Game by takeover score
Texas
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Texas: 69. Georgia: 26. App State: 100. NC State: 29. Stanford: 8. Florida State: 22. Wake Forest: 104. Virginia: 38. Louisville: 22. Virginia Tech: 39. Pittsburgh: 15. South Carolina: 35. SMU: 23
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas: 4 by 100. Georgia: 3 by 57.8. App State: 7 by 95.2. NC State: 2 by 96.7. Stanford: 2 by 26.7. Florida State: 3 by 48.9. Wake Forest: 7 by 99. Virginia: 5 by 50.7. Louisville: 3 by 48.9. Virginia Tech: 3 by 86.7. Pittsburgh: 3 by 33.3. South Carolina: 3 by 77.8. SMU: 4 by 38.3
Split Comparison
Wins42 · n=9 · +4 vs Losses
Losses38 · n=4 · -4 vs Wins
First Half51.1 · n=7 · +22.5 vs Second Half
Second Half28.7 · n=6 · -22.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Wake Forest
Best efficiency game
100 vs Texas
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/21 | @ Texas | L 24-38 | — | 4 | 69 | 17.3 | 17.30 | 0 | 28 |
| Sun 12/8 | @ SMU2+ TD | W 34-31 | — | 4 | 23 | 5.8 | 5.80 | 2 | 8 |
| Sat 11/30 | vs South Carolina | L 14-17 | — | 3 | 35 | 11.7 | 11.70 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 11/16 | @ Pittsburgh | W 24-20 | — | 3 | 15 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 11/9 | @ Virginia Tech | W 24-14 | — | 3 | 39 | 13 | 13 | 1 | 19 |
| Sat 11/2 | vs Louisville | L 21-33 | — | 3 | 22 | 7.3 | 7.30 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 10/19 | vs Virginia | W 48-31 | — | 5 | 38 | 7.6 | 7.60 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 10/12 | @ Wake Forest100 receiving yards | W 49-14 | — | 7 | 104 | 14.9 | 14.90 | 1 | 28 |
| Sat 10/5 | @ Florida State | W 29-13 | — | 3 | 22 | 7.3 | 7.30 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 9/28 | vs Stanford | W 40-14 | — | 2 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 5 |
| Sat 9/21 | vs NC State | W 59-35 | — | 2 | 29 | 14.5 | 14.50 | 0 | 18 |
| Sun 9/8 | vs App State100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 66-20 | — | 7 | 100 | 14.3 | 14.30 | 2 | 41 |
| Sat 8/31 | @ Georgia | L 3-34 | — | 3 | 26 | 8.7 | 8.70 | 0 | 19 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Clemson
2021-2024
Opening stop
Season Progression
2021202220222023202320242024
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 Regular Season | Clemson | 67 | 86.7 | 6.4 | — |
| 2022 Postseason | Clemson | 285 | 59.5 | 10.6 | 218 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Clemson | 285 | 59.5 | 10.6 | 0 |
| 2023 Postseason | Clemson | 498 | 53 | 16.6 | 213 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Clemson | 498 | 53 | 16.6 | 0 |
| 2024 Postseason | Clemson | 530 | 66.2 | 15.5 | 32 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Clemson | 530 | 66.2 | 15.5 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Miami
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
126
Primary metric
126 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Wake Forest
104
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
104 receiving yards with a 99 efficiency score.
#3
App State
100
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
100 receiving yards with a 95.2 efficiency score.
#4
UConn
56
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
56 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Wake Forest
72
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
72 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2024 Postseason · Clemson
530 primary output · 66.2 efficiency · 15.5 usage
57.5
#2
2024 Regular Season · Clemson
57.5
530 primary · 66.2 efficiency · 15.5 usage
#3
2023 Postseason · Clemson
49.4
498 primary · 53 efficiency · 16.6 usage
Milestones
3
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
3
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2021 · Rating 0.9713
Ravenwood · Brentwood, TN
- Committed To
- Clemson
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2021
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
1,380
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 39 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.