Usage Score
15.2
Player Dossier
2021-2025UTSA
LB • 6'1" • 230 lbs • Houston, TX, USA
Shadrach Banks shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 42.5 disruption score.
Usage Score
15.2
Efficiency
42.5
Consistency
36.5
Season Value
48.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2025 Postseason · UTSA
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Shadrach Banks, LB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2025 Postseason · UTSA. Shadrach Banks shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 42.5 disruption score.
Shadrach Banks played LB for TCU and UTSA. Across 5 tracked seasons, Shadrach Banks recorded 193 tackles and 3 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2025 with UTSA.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
UTSA paired 16.5 primary output with 42.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 42.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across TCU, UTSA.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Florida International
Win with 5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
1.3
Efficiency
42.5
Usage
15.2
Consistency
36.5
Best Game by takeover score
Florida International
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Florida International: 5. Texas A&M: 1. Texas State: 2. Incarnate Word: 1. Colorado State: 0. Temple: 0. Rice: 1. North Texas: 0. Tulane: 2. South Florida: 0.5. Charlotte: 0. East Carolina: 3. Army: 1
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Florida International: 8 by 83.3. Texas A&M: 7 by 39.2. Texas State: 9 by 57.5. Incarnate Word: 5 by 30.8. Colorado State: 11 by 45.8. Temple: 6 by 25. Rice: 6 by 35. North Texas: 2 by 8.3. Tulane: 6 by 45. South Florida: 5 by 25.8. Charlotte: 8 by 33.3. East Carolina: 10 by 71.7. Army: 10 by 51.7
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Florida International
Best efficiency game
83.3 vs Florida International
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/27 | vs Florida InternationalSplash game | W 57-20 | 8 | 4 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/29 | vs Army10+ tackles | L 24-27 | 10 | 7 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/22 | vs East Carolina10+ tackles · Splash game | W 58-24 | 10 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/15 | @ Charlotte | W 28-7 | 8 | 7 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 11/7 | @ South Florida | L 23-55 | 5 | 3 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Thu 10/30 | vs TulaneSplash game | W 48-26 | 6 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/18 | @ North Texas | L 17-55 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/11 | vs Rice | W 61-13 | 6 | 6 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/4 | @ Temple | L 21-27 | 6 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/21 | @ Colorado State10+ tackles | W 17-16 | 11 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/13 | vs Incarnate Word | W 48-20 | 5 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Texas StateSplash game | L 36-43 | 9 | 5 | — | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 8/30 | @ Texas A&M | L 24-42 | 7 | 6 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
TCU
2021-2024
Opening stop
UTSA
2025
Final stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 Regular Season | TCU | 2 | 11.7 | 3.7 | — |
| 2022 Regular Season | TCU | 4 | 14.6 | 3.9 | 2 |
| 2023 Regular Season | TCU | 11.5 | 32 | 11.2 | 7.5 |
| 2024 Regular Season | TCU | 0 | 4.2 | 0.7 | -11.5 |
| 2025 Postseason | UTSA | 16.5 | 42.5 | 15.2 | 16.5 |
| 2025 Regular Season | UTSA | 16.5 | 42.5 | 15.2 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Florida International
Win with 5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
5
Primary metric
5 disruption/tackle impact with 66.5 takeover score.
#2
Oklahoma
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 61.8 takeover score.
#3
Baylor
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 56.7 takeover score.
#4
East Carolina
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 51.2 takeover score.
#5
Texas Tech
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 50.3 takeover score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2025 Postseason · UTSA
16.5 primary output · 42.5 efficiency · 15.2 usage
48.6
#2
2025 Regular Season · UTSA
48.6
16.5 primary · 42.5 efficiency · 15.2 usage
#3
2023 Regular Season · TCU
44.6
11.5 primary · 32 efficiency · 11.2 usage
2
Impact games
9
Splash games
4
10+ tackle games
Career Facts
2
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
193
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 43 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.