Player Stats

Maxen Hook College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
344
TFL
8.5
Sacks
2
QB hurries
2
Passes defended
15
Touchdowns
2

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2020 Regular SeasonToledo24-0--041.4
2021 PostseasonToledo13710--045
2021 Regular SeasonToledo13892.51-3245
2022 Regular SeasonToledo9673114065.5
2023 Regular SeasonToledo969-014061
2024 Regular SeasonToledo1210820-4059.4

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season

Toledo paired 11 primary output with 42.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

2024 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 41.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2024 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Miami (OH)

Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2024 Regular Season · Toledo

Games

12

Havoc Plays / G

0.7

Efficiency

41.4

Usage

8.2

Consistency

54.9

Best Game by takeover score

Miami (OH)

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Duquesne: 0. Massachusetts: 0. Mississippi State: 0. Western Kentucky: 1. Miami (OH): 2. Buffalo: 1. Northern Illinois: 1. Bowling Green: 0. Eastern Michigan: 1. Central Michigan: 1. Ohio: 1. Akron: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Duquesne: 6 by 25. Massachusetts: 5 by 20.8. Mississippi State: 12 by 50. Western Kentucky: 3 by 22.5. Miami (OH): 9 by 57.5. Buffalo: 15 by 60. Northern Illinois: 13 by 60. Bowling Green: 10 by 41.7. Eastern Michigan: 10 by 51.7. Central Michigan: 5 by 30.8. Ohio: 16 by 60. Akron: 4 by 16.7

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.7 · Games = 7 · +0.1 vs Losses
Losses0.6 · Games = 5 · -0.1 vs Wins